I'd Probably Scroll by
An Exploration of Young People's Views on Spotting and Stopping Misinformation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7149536 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yvonne Skipper (0000-0001-7011-3439, University of Glasgow Glasgow UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 940-949 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Children & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-0605 • E-ISSN: 1099-0860 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/chso.12962 |
| OpenAlex | W4409812841 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 49 |
Misinformation is one of the defining challenges of our era. Many young people are online for multiple hours a day and are exposed to vast amounts of misinformation. However, there is limited research exploring their understanding of what misinformation is and whether they feel equipped to spot and challenge it. The aim of the current study was to qualitatively explore young people's views on misinformation. Participants were N = 37 pupils aged from 11 to 14 who participated in focus groups. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Three main themes were identified: awareness of misinformation, detection of misinformation and stopping misinformation. Although participants were aware of misinformation, they felt that spotting it was an intuitive skill and relied on others to help identify it. They did not feel empowered to challenge misinformation and felt the platforms had a key role in stopping the spread. This has implications for the design of misinformation interventions
Art · Computer security · Misinformation · Scroll · Spotting · Theology · Visual arts · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Motivated Heuristic and Systematic Processing
When Do Audiences Verify? How Perceptions About Message and Source Influence Audience Verification of News Headlines
Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation
Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News
Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation
Credibility Perceptions and Detection Accuracy of Fake News Headlines on Social Media
Believing the Unbelievable
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation
Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility
Online Fake News about Food
Distrust by default
Teens’ Motivations to Spread Fake News on WhatsApp
Beyond (Mis)Representation
The methodological potential of focus groups in population geography
Comparing children’s and teens’ news engagement practices and affective news experiences
Fake news on social media
Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning
Students’ Civic Online Reasoning
Civic Preparation for the Digital Age
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Towards psychological herd immunity
"Fake news" and the defection of 2012 Obama voters in the 2016 presidential election
Behavioral Strategies for Dealing with Flaming in An Online Forum
The methodology of Focus Groups
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |