Peer threat evaluations shape one’s own threat perceptions and feelings of distress
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7149998 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lisa Espinosa (0000-0001-7327-6815, Karolinska Institutet), Erik C Nook (0000-0001-7967-0792, Princeton University), Martin Asperholm (0000-0002-6340-3638, Karolinska Institutet), Therese Collins (0000-0003-2793-3559, Karolinska Institutet), Juliet Y Davidow (0000-0002-6857-3855, Harvard University), Andreas Olsson (0000-0001-5272-7744, Karolinska Institutet, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 431-444 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognition & Emotion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-9931 • E-ISSN: 1464-0600 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02699931.2024.2417231 |
| PMID | 39530614 |
| OpenAlex | W4404255022 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
We are continuously exposed to what others think and feel about content online. How do others' evaluations shared in this medium influence our own beliefs and emotional responses? In two pre-registered studies, we investigated the social transmission of threat and safety evaluations in a paradigm that mimicked online social media platforms. In Study 1 (N = 103), participants viewed images and indicated how distressed they made them feel. Participants then categorised these images as threatening or safe for others to see, while seeing how "previous participants" ostensibly categorised them (these values were actually manipulated across images). We found that participants incorporated both peers' categorisations of the images and their own distress ratings when categorizing images as threatening or safe. Study 2 (N = 115) replicated these findings and further demonstrated that peers' categorisations shifted how distressed these images made them feel. Taken together, our results indicate that people integrate their own and others' experiences when exposed to emotional content and that social information can influence both our perceptions of things as threatening or safe, as well as our own emotional responses to them. Our findings provide replicable experimental evidence that social information is a powerful conduit for the transmission of affective evaluations and experiences
Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Distress · Feeling · Perception · Clinical Psychology · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Social network determinants of depression
An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
Digital Emotion Contagion
Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (Oasis)
Extracting, Computing and Exploring the Parameters of Statistical Models using R
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks
Social Influence
The PHQ-9
Do actions speak louder than voices? The signaling role of social information cues in influencing consumer purchase decisions
The MAD Model of Moral Contagion
Social information influences emotional experience and late positive potential response to affective pictures
Free speech as a cultural value in the United States
Political Psychology in the Digital (mis)Information age
The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation
Saying is believing”
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Moral outrage in the digital age
A multimodal theory of affect diffusion
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |