Using Eye Movements to Understand Sense of Control in Situated Action
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7150326 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nils Wendel Heinrich (0009-0001-2375-744X, Institute of Information Systems (IFIS), Department of Computer Science and Engineering Universität zu Lübeck, corresponding author), Annika Österdiekhoff (0000-0002-9918-4609, Social Cognitive Systems, Faculty of Technology, CITEC Bielefeld University), Stefan Kopp (0000-0002-4047-9277, Social Cognitive Systems, Faculty of Technology, CITEC Bielefeld University), Nele Russwinkel (0000-0003-2606-9690, Institute of Information Systems (IFIS), Department of Computer Science and Engineering Universität zu Lübeck) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | e70154-e70154 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognitive Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cogs.70154 |
| PMID | 41456930 |
| OpenAlex | W7117474241 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
This series of studies investigated the interplay between the Sense of Control, continuous action control, and eye‐movement behavior in dynamic and uncertain environments. Across three experiments, we used a custom‐designed environment combined with eye‐tracking to examine how action goal pursuit and visual strategies were adapted to deal with motor perturbations of varying predictability. Participants steered a spaceship, avoiding walls and obstacles while contending with random input noise and predictable horizontal drift. We found that changes in fixation distances to a reference point, the spaceship, indicated the type of action control employed. Input noise was associated with decreasing distances in fixations already close to the spaceship, addressing immediate demands for maintaining the spaceship's trajectory. In contrast, fixations allocated within the outer vicinity of the spaceship featured even longer distances in response to drift, suggesting visual exploration and proactive planning. That is, reactive strategies of action control were characterized by immediate responses to unpredictable disturbances, whereas proactive strategies reflected anticipatory adjustments to predictable changes. Furthermore, judgments about the own Sense of Control were closely tied to participants' ability to anticipate and adapt to environmental features. Invisible perturbations led to control loss and reduced task performance, but predictable perturbations allowed participants to maintain a high Sense of Control and still successfully solve the task. These results highlight how cognitive processes and sensorimotor control interact to navigate uncertain environments by flexibly balancing reactive and proactive strategies of action control
Cognition · Eye movement · Motor Control · Situated · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Motor Control and Adaptation · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|