Seeking the Category
The Pragmatic Function of Formal Explanations and the Role of Cognitive Reflection
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7150362 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ivan Aslanov (0000-0002-2105-8012, University of Chile, corresponding author), Alexey Kotov (Laboratory for Cognitive Research HSE University), Ernesto Guerra (0000-0001-7403-5271, University of Chile), Alina Fedoriaieva (Laboratory for Cognitive Research HSE University), Tatyana Kotova (0000-0002-2583-1922, Department of Psychology The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | e70101-e70101 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cognitive Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cogs.70101 |
| PMID | 40802863 |
| OpenAlex | W4413116183 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 52 |
Formal explanations are statements that explain properties of an object by referring to its category. This study investigates the role of pragmatics in the evaluation of formal explanations. Across six experiments, we examined how a questioner's knowledge of category identity and an explanation's capability to specify a category affect satisfaction with such explanations. Experiments 1a and 1b demonstrate that participants find formal explanations less satisfactory when the questioner is already aware of the category identity. Experiments 2a and 2b show that participants assumed a questioner was unaware of an object's category if they were satisfied with the formal explanation. In Experiment 3, open‐ended responses revealed that satisfied questioners were perceived as seeking to learn a category identity, while dissatisfied ones were assumed to have other motives. Finally, Experiment 4 compares tautological formal explanations (where a label points to all categories possessing a particular feature at once) and nontautological ones (where a label points to one of several competing categories), and examines the role of cognitive reflection in their evaluation. It demonstrates that people with high cognitive reflection are more sensitive to pragmatic context and value a formal explanation more if it can identify a specific category. This study shows that formal explanations are satisfactory when they fulfill a specific pragmatic function, namely, helping to define a category when the questioner knows only its feature. It also shows that people prone to automatic intuitive responses are less likely to consider this function and tend to evaluate formal explanations independently of this part of the pragmatic context
Categorization · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Neuroscience · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models
The misunderstood limits of folk science
How to Interpret Statistical Models Using marginaleffects for R and Python
Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models
Assessing miserly information processing
Psychological essentialism in children
The structure and function of explanations
The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations
The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition
Phenomenology of social explanation
The seductive allure effect extends from neuroscientific to psychoanalytic explanations among Turkish medical students
On the Disposition to Think Analytically
Motivated to learn
How “is” shapes “ought” for folk-biological concepts
Explanations in the wild
Are formal explanations mere placeholders or pointers
Adults' learning of complex explanations violates their intuitions about optimal explanatory order
Neuroscience explanations really do satisfy
Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of th natural world
"Are Children "Intuitive Theists
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |