Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do We Appeal to the Knowledge of Our Political Rivals

Bibliographic Data

ID7150319
AuthorsAlmos C Molnar (0009-0003-2559-428X, Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences Brown University, corresponding author), Vini A Rupchandani (Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences Brown University), Steven A Sloman (0000-0001-8223-3788, Institut des Sciences Cognitives), Steven Sloman (Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences Brown University)
Year2026
Volume50
Issue1
Pagese70177-e70177
Publication date2026-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognitive Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cogs.70177
PMID41587395
OpenAlexW7125699916
LanguageEN
References cited33

Categorical explanations involve the use of labels to account for various properties of the explanandum. Prior research shows that the degree to which a label is perceived to be entrenched in society impacts the judged quality of the categorical explanation that invokes it regardless of how informative the explanation actually is. The aim of the present paper is to investigate whether the label entrenchment effect persists even when the label is said to be entrenched only in a particular community (rather than in society at large) and whether one's relationship to the entrenching community mediates the effect. Across five online behavioral experiments, we show that US partisans (Democrats and Republicans) rated the informativeness of a circular categorical explanation as higher when the label it invokes is entrenched in their own political community than when it is entrenched in the rival political community. However, being entrenched in the rival political community led to higher informativeness judgments than not being entrenched at all. Finally, we show that the effect does not occur when the label is entrenched in an epistemically suspect community, the Flat Earth Society

Appeal · Categorical variable · Politics · Suspect · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology

  • The misunderstood limits of folk science

    Open Access•Leonid Rozenblit, Leon Rozenblit et al.•Cognitive Science•2002

  • Google Effects on Memory

    Open Access•Betsy Sparrow, Jenny Liu et al.•Science•2011

  • Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams

    Open Access•Steve W J Kozlowski, Daniel R Ilgen•Psychological Science in the…•2006

  • A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory

    Daniel M Wegner•Social Cognition•1995

  • Cognitive Interdependence in Close Relationships

    Daniel M Wegner, Toni Giuliano et al.•Compatible and Incompatible…•1985

  • Against Democracy

    Jason Brennan•Against Democracy•2016

  • The Bias That Divides Us

    Keith E Stanovich•The Bias That Divides Us•2021

  • Are formal explanations mere placeholders or pointers

    Open Access•Shamauri Rivera, Sam Prasad et al.•Cognition•2023

  • Transactive Memory

    Daniel M Wegner•Theories of Group Behavior•1987

  • Varieties of Confirmation Bias

    Joshua Klayman•Decision Making from a Cognitive…•1995

  • The Division of Cognitive Labor

    Philip Kitcher•The Journal of Philosophy•1990

  • Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding

    Open Access•Philip M Fernbach, Todd Rogers et al.•Psychological Science•2013

  • How others drive our sense of understanding of policies

    Open Access•Nathaniel Rabb, John J Han et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2020

  • Seeking the Category

    Open Access•Ivan Aslanov, Alexey Kotov et al.•Cognitive Science•2025

  • Opinions on Fictitious Issues

    George F Bishop, Alfred J Tuchfarber et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986

  • Biased assimilation and attitude polarization

    Charles G Lord, Lee Ro et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Motivated skepticism

    Peter H Ditto, David F Lopez•Journal of Personality and Social…•1992

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae