Estimating the density of urban trees in 1890s Leeds and Edinburgh using object detection on historical maps
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7150586 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eleanor S Smith (0000-0002-1196-3529, University of Leeds, corresponding author), Christopher Fleet (0009-0006-9794-6012, National Library of Scotland), Stuart King (0000-0003-0041-0184, University of Edinburgh), William Mackane (0000-0001-6581-5989, University of Edinburgh), William Mackaness, Hannah Walker (0000-0002-3851-7502), Hannah L Walker (0000-0002-1659-3731, Forest Research), Catherine E Scott (0000-0003-0860-4805, University of Leeds) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Pages | 102219 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Computers Environment and Urban Systems (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0198-9715 • E-ISSN: 1873-7587 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102219 |
| OpenAlex | W4404442937 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 26 |
We present a new end-to-end methodology for extracting symbols from historical maps and demonstrate an application of the method to extract details of the urban forests of Leeds and Edinburgh in the UK using Ordnance Survey maps from the 1890s. The methods presented allow tree symbols on 1:500 scale maps to be efficiently extracted, with our object detection model achieving an F 1 -score of 0.945. The results for each city are presented on the National Library of Scotland website and have been used to generate an estimate of 37 ± 1 tree symbols per hectare for Leeds in 1888–90 and 40 ± 1 tree symbols per hectare for Edinburgh in 1893–94. This is the first time that quantitative data has been obtained for historical urban tree counts in these two cities. The method presented can be expanded to other UK towns and cities and is a valuable tool for learning about the past, and changes to both the natural and built environment over time, aiding decisions on future tree planting. We discuss the process used to automate the generation of training data and to train a machine learning model to extract the symbols, comparing it with other possible models. This discussion provides context on how best to tackle similar problems of symbol extraction from historical maps and the issues that may arise in such automated analysis, alongside factors that must be considered when using historical maps as a data source. • We know very little about urban trees from the 1890s, but they can help us understand our current urban forests. • An object detection machine learning algorithm is used to extract tree symbols from historical Ordnance Survey maps. • Tree symbol locations, sizes and species are detected on digitised maps of 1890s Leeds and Edinburgh. • Edinburgh has a higher tree symbol density per hectare and a higher proportion of conifer tree symbols compared to Leeds
Cartography · Geography · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Artificial Intelligence
Faster R-CNN
A fragment-based approach for computing the long-term visual evolution of historical maps
Building Block Extraction from Historical Maps Using Deep Object Attention Networks
Automatic Road Extraction from Historical Maps Using Deep Learning Techniques
Towards the automated large-scale reconstruction of past road networks from historical maps
The Origin, Development and Decline of Back-to-Back Houses in Leeds, 1787–1937
Potential of deep learning segmentation for the extraction of archaeological features from historical map series
Trees and woodland in the British landscape
Ordnance Survey Maps
Geographic features recognition for heritage landscape mapping - Case study
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |