The discursive function of Meta’s Newsroom
How Meta frames the problem of problematic online content
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7150992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edward Hurcombe (0000-0002-5838-2019, RMIT University, corresponding author), Ehsan Dehghan (0000-0003-3139-5298, Queensland University of Technology), Laura Vodden (0009-0004-6792-8580, Queensland University of Technology), Daniel Angus (0000-0002-1412-5096, Queensland University of Technology) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1649-1671 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1354-8565 • E-ISSN: 1748-7382 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/13548565251315521 |
| OpenAlex | W4407065294 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 20 |
This article examines the social technology company Meta’s public communication on problematic content, via their official ‘Meta Newsroom’, within the context of growing regulatory scrutiny. For nearly a decade, the Meta Newsroom has been a major outlet for Meta company announcements, and since 2016, the Newsroom has increasingly become a key source for company responses to concerns regarding mis/disinformation and other kinds of problematic content on Meta’s platforms. Using a mixed-methods approach informed by discourse analysis, this article critically examines Newsrooms posts from 2016 to early 2021. It asks: how is Meta framing ‘problems’ on its platforms? How is Meta identifying ‘solutions’ to those problems? And is Meta ‘nudging’ policymakers in specific conceptual directions? Overall, we find that Meta is framing content moderation issues through four key frames – ‘authenticity’, ‘political advertising’, ‘technological solutions’, and ‘enforcement’ – that benefit Meta, as they shift responsibility while also demonstrating that Meta is an active and capable problem-solver
Biology · Information retrieval · Computer Science · Mathematics · Media Studies and Communication · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics
Methods of Critical Discourse Studies
Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping
Safe from “harm”
Data craft
Discourse and Discrimination
Muslims in social media discourse
Ripples of mediatization
Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis
Facebook futures
Making the world more open and connected”
Enhanced self-regulation
Media representation of digital-free tourism
Behold the metaverse
Australia’s Digi Code
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |