How to Conduct a Classic Grounded Theory in 12 Months
A Practical Guide for PhD Students
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7156567 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tracy Flenady (0000-0002-5286-4789, Central Queensland University, corresponding author), Justine Connor (0000-0003-0684-3597, Central Queensland University), Kara Vander Linden (0000-0002-3699-708X, Scientific Methods (United States)) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069251412256 |
| OpenAlex | W7117108019 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 14 |
Classic Grounded Theory (classic GT), developed by Glaser and Strauss (1967), is a powerful qualitative methodology designed to generate theory grounded in data. Despite its enduring relevance across disciplines, classic GT is often perceived as too time-consuming and complex for doctoral candidates, particularly within the constraints of a 12-month research timeline. This manuscript challenges that perception and presents a practical framework demonstrating that classic GT can be both rigorous and feasible within a single year. Through a detailed synthesis of classic GT principles and processes, including constant comparative analysis, theoretical sampling, memoing, and the deliberate deferral of the literature review, this paper outlines a streamlined six-phase timeline designed to guide doctoral candidates efficiently from field entry to final write-up. Emphasis is placed on the early identification of the core category, which acts as a conceptual anchor, accelerating data collection and focused analysis. In this manuscript, we offer practical strategies to manage common challenges such as achieving theoretical saturation, maintaining theoretical sensitivity, and avoiding conceptual drift. It also underscores the critical role of supervision and peer support in sustaining momentum and methodological integrity throughout the research process. A streamlined timeline (Appendix B) illustrates how doctoral researchers can generate high-quality, substantive theory without compromising the emergent and discovery-driven foundations of classic GT. This work contributes to the growing body of literature advocating for classic GT’s wider adoption and demonstrates its compatibility with the demands of contemporary doctoral research. This work offers timely, actionable guidance for candidates, supervisors, and institutions seeking to support grounded theory research within structured academic timeframes
Conceptual framework · Development theory · Grounded theory · Perception · Qualitative research · Timeline · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Statistics Education and Methodologies
Adapting and blending grounded theory with case study
The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on Writing Performance and Learning of Secondary School Students
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Protecting Personhood
Grounded theory research
The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |