Teacher Guidance and On‐the‐Fly Scaffolding in Primary School Students' Inquiry Learning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7167256 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Heide Sasse (0000-0003-2091-8401, RPTU Landau Germany, corresponding author), Anke Maria Weber (0000-0001-5643-0999, Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences University of Luxembourg Luxembourg Luxembourg), Timo Reuter (0000-0002-2098-206X, RPTU Landau Germany), Miriam Leuchter (0000-0002-7962-6561, RPTU Landau Germany) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 579-604 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21921 |
| OpenAlex | W4404330840 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 101 |
In primary science education, inquiry‐based science instruction stands out as an optimal learning environment for fostering domain‐specific content and procedural knowledge. Recognizing the effectiveness of different forms of teacher guidance, there is an ongoing debate about the planning of high ( structured inquiry ) and low ( guided inquiry ) guidance and their optimal sequencing. This debate revolves around balancing the level of autonomy and the amount of conceptual information given to students. Furthermore, the complete understanding of the impact of responsive teaching, which encompasses a broad range of practices, including on‐the‐fly scaffolding such as Promoting Participation , Focusing , and Problematizing , remains elusive. To address this gap, this study examines the relationship between planned teacher guidance and specific instances of responsive teaching, particularly on‐the‐fly scaffolding in the inquiry‐based science classroom. A pre‐posttest design was employed, involving 164 primary school students ( M = 9.9 years, SD = 0.66, 57% female) and one female experimenter. Domain‐specific content knowledge contained science concepts of thermal insulation, whereas procedural knowledge comprised the application of the control‐of‐variables strategy. The sequential order of planned teacher guidance, structured inquiry , and guided inquiry , was systematically varied, and the experimenter was allowed to provide spontaneous on‐the‐fly scaffolding. The study assesses the influence of planned teacher guidance and specific instances of responsive teaching, particularly on‐the‐fly scaffolding on students' conceptual and procedural knowledge. Results indicate no differential learning effects based on the order of planned guidance. However, when planned guided inquiry was provided second, the teacher gave less on‐the‐fly scaffolding. Additionally, Problematizing had a positive effect, while Focusing had a negative effect on students' procedural knowledge learning
Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Physics · Primary (astronomy) · Scaffold · Science education · Science learning · Chemistry · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
Designing a Phenomenon-Based Learning Boxset to foster scientific literacy in under-resourced schools
The effects of a metacognitive scaffolding-supported online inquiry-based learning approach on students’ science achievement, metacognitive ability, and inquiry skills
Teachers’ perspectives on scaffolding open inquiry in primary school science
Personalized learning strategies for considering students’ interests
Hands‐on and Minds‐on? Findings on the Instructional Support of Preschool Teachers to Foster Children's Understanding of Scientific Practices
How Teacher-Related Factors Affect Students’ Higher-Order Thinking in the Urban Science Classroom
International Handbook of Research on Teachers' Beliefs
Scaffolding Complex Learning
One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons
A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education
Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction
Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases
On Teaching Adaptively
Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education?
Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation
The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction
Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?
Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction
Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching
Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning
All Other Things Being Equal
Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning
Productive Failure
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving
A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Problem-solving support and instructional sequence
Error handling in the classroom
The relative effectiveness of different active learning implementations in teaching elementary school students how to design simple experiments
Effect size measures for longitudinal growth analyses
Null relations between CLASS scores and gains in children’s language, math, and executive function skills
The undermining effect is a reality after all—Extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination
When Rater Reliability Is Not Enough
Adapting Teacher Interventions to Student Needs During Cooperative Learning
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations
On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change
Does Thoughtfully Adaptive Teaching Actually Exist? A Challenge to Teacher Educators
| Citations per year | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |