Yes, everyone is blindfolded but that doesn’t make it equal
The intersectional experiences of visually impaired women footballers in England
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7168795 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jessica Louise Macbeth (0000-0002-2564-2267, University of Lancashire, corresponding author), Andrew Sprake (0000-0001-5164-770X, University of Lancashire) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1182-1195 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sport Education and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1357-3322 • E-ISSN: 1470-1243 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13573322.2025.2460173 |
| OpenAlex | W4407093982 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 41 |
In recent years, there have been concerted global efforts to develop women’s visually impaired (VI) football. However, these developments have not occurred without challenges and the players’ experiences during this significant period of progress have received no academic attention. We adopt an intra-categorical complexity approach to intersectionality to explore VI women’s experiences of becoming and being footballers. The study utilises a focus group and in-depth semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of seven women, with differing sight conditions, who have participated in VI football in England. Using abductive analysis, we examine how the players’ lived experiences have been shaped by the complex intersections of being female, disabled and, more specifically, VI. Our analysis reveals that these intersections create inequitable outcomes for footballers with various subordinate identities. The main inequities derive from the historic marginalisation of women in disability football and include the challenges of learning a new sport, players with different sight conditions adjusting to wearing blindfolds in blind football, and tensions between players brought about by the combination of B1–B3 classes. The findings reveal the complex lived realities of VI women footballers, which have implications for key stakeholders tasked with growing the game in a manner that leads to more equitable outcomes for VI women
Ableism · Football · Intersectionality · Pedagogy · Political science · Sociology · Visually impaired · Computer Science · Disability Rights and Representation · Gender Studies · Law · Psychology · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sports, Gender, and Society
Disability, gender, and rurality in school physical education
What constitutes bodily difference? – An ethnographic study of a provincial men's blind football team in China
Investigating the impairment-performance relationship during competition in elite blind and partially sighted football
An intersectional examination of blind and visually impaired women’s physical activity experiences
We’re Putting All Our Eggs in the Gender Basket”
Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex
Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex
Disability and Youth Sport
A Guide to Abductive Thematic Analysis
‘I had to pop a wheelie and pay extra attention in order not to fall
Toward a Theory of Disability and Gender
Operationalization of intersectionality in physical activity and sport research
Tensions, perspectives and themes in disability studies
Girls with learning disabilities and ‘football on the brain’
We know who is a cheat and who is not. But what can you do?”
You’re always fighting to be recognized’
Navigating a sighted world
Classification of Disabled Athletes
Gender Parity, False Starts, and Promising Practices in the Paralympic Movement
Restrictions of activity in partially sighted football
Disabled Women
Intersectional Invisibility
Co-Interviewing in Qualitative Social Research
Confidentiality in qualitative research
Disabled sportswomen and gender construction in powerchair football
From the Guest Editors
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
Abductive Coding
The Complexity of Intersectionality
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |