How Did the Generative Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted Digital Multimodal Composing Process Facilitate the Production of Quality Digital Multimodal Compositions
Toward a Process‐Genre Integrated Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7169331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lianjiang Jiang (0000-0002-6662-5332, Academic Unit of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Hong Kong, corresponding author), Chun Lai (0000-0002-7915-113X, Academic Unit of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Hong Kong) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | S1 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | TESOL Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-8322 • E-ISSN: 1545-7249 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/tesq.3390 |
| OpenAlex | W4408815526 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
| References cited | 33 |
The past decades witness an ongoing interest in reconceptualizing writing as digital multimodal composing (DMC). The emergence of language and multimodal generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools leads to new forms of DMC processes and products. Yet prior studies have mostly examined non‐GAI‐assisted DMC, and few have explored how GAI‐assisted DMC processes would facilitate students' authoring of quality DMC products. This study addresses the gaps by conceptualizing the notion of quality DMC product, and comparing the composing processes and products of 14 GAI‐assisted DMC groups against 10 non‐GAI groups across four English classrooms. Multiple sources of data were collected for a mixed method study. The findings show that while non‐GAI groups demonstrated similar performance outcomes with GAI groups in base units, layouts, and rhetorical relations, the GAI groups had significantly higher scores in the development of purpose, outline/navigation skills, and their overall DMC outcomes. A taxonomy of GAI's affordances in facilitating DMC was also identified. Based on the findings, the study develops a process‐genre integrated GAI‐assisted DMC model for future teachers to guide students' GAI‐assisted DMC processes toward quality DMC product. This integrated model links DMC processes to products and specifies the roles of teachers and students when composing with GAI
Epistemology · Generative grammar · Multimodal therapy · Process (computing · Production (economics · Quality (philosophy · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Digital multimodal composing
Exploring the emotional experiences of implementing GenAI-assisted digital multimodal composing
Doing Digital Multimodal Composing with Generative Artificial Intelligence
Preparing preservice English teachers to teach digital literacies
Assessing GenAI-assisted digital multimodal composing
Evaluating generative artificial intelligence’s role in enhancing feedback for digital multimodal compositions
AI as a collaborator
Gender Equity in Wikibook Collaborative Writing Assisted by Multimodal Generative AI Tools
AI-Generated Tailor-Made Pedagogical Picture Books
Promoting second language writing autonomy through digital multimodal composing
From passive consumers to critical creators
Fostering sustainable cross-cultural learning through AI-supported multimodal storytelling activities
Reconceptualizing teacher multimodal literacy in classroom practice
Generative artificial intelligence and L2 writing
Mapping the Research Terrain of Digital Multimodal Composing in L2 Contexts
GenAI ‐Assisted Digital Multimodal Composing in Tesol Teacher Education
Designing Feedback and Assessment for GenAI ‐Assisted Digital Multimodal Composition in L2
Assessment of Digital Multimodal Composing
Exploring prompt iteration process through generative AI image creation in EFL vocabulary learning
Commentary
How L2 Learners Negotiate Meaning in GenAI‐Supported Creative Writing
Impact of Information Literacy and Discourse Synthesis Strategy Use on Multimodal Information‐Based Integrated Writing Among Secondary School Students
Critical digital literacies, generative AI, and the negotiation of agency in human-AI interactions
Enabling critical digital literacies through GenAI-assisted multimodal composing
Learner-initiated self-selection as a next speaker in a technology-mediated L2 learning environment
Advocating linguistic justice through digital multimodal composing against GenAI biases
Multimodality
Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum
The Mann-Whitney U
Diversity and Standards in Writing for Publication in the Age of AI—Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Speculative Propositions for Digital Writing Under the New Autonomous Model of Literacy
Comparing monomodal traditional writing and digital multimodal composing in EAP classrooms
Re-exploring writer-reader interaction
Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing
Beyond ChatGPT
The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of english as a second or foreign language
Developing a genre-based model for assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing
Multimodal assignments in higher education
Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing
Twenty‐first century technologies and language education
Cultivating writerly virtues
Facilitating EFL students’ civic participation through digital multimodal composing
Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms
Digital multimodal composing in L2 classrooms
Multilingual youths’ digital activism through multimodal composing in the post-pandemic era
Digital Storytelling With Youth From Refugee Backgrounds
Remix Culture and English Language Teaching
Using Artificial Intelligence in Tesol
Digital Literacies in Tesol
| Citations per year | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |