Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An evaluation of a multidisciplinary care planning tool for people with intellectual disabilities and behaviours of concern

Bibliographic Data

ID7176404
AuthorsTamsin Tripp (Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK), Rebecca Goodey (Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK), Shoumitro Deb (0000-0002-1300-8103, Imperial College London, London, UK), Oliver P Thomson (0000-0003-3062-9056, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust), Oliver Thomson (Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK), Jonathan Gartside (Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK), Kelvyn Hipperson (Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK), Rohit Shankar (0000-0002-1183-6933, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Truro, UK, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume71
Issue4
Pages655-669
Publication date2024-11-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7640 • E-ISSN: 1741-2854
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00207640241299395
PMID39611535
OpenAlexW4404857526
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited39

Background Multidisciplinary care planning for people with intellectual disabilities who engage in behaviours of concern (BoC) is challenging and complex. Effective collaborative understanding and action planning across all stakeholders is essential. Cornwall’s Adult Community Learning Disability Team developed a care planning tool ( Connect Behaviour ) using contemporary evidence and best practice. Connect Behaviour is designed to facilitate care planning by collaborative and enhanced shared understanding and is also available as an interactive web-based tool. Aim To evaluate Connect behaviour using stakeholders’ experiences. Methods Family members, care providers, advocates, social workers and professionals who had attended meetings guided by the Connect Behaviour care planning tool in a 3-month period were interviewed about their experiences of those meetings. This was interpreted using inductive thematic analysis. Results Of 71 individuals identified as meeting this criterion of inclusion 61 were contactable and 27 consented to participation. These participants consisted of 17 health professionals, two parents, two social workers, three advocates, two positive behaviour support advisors within care providers, and one manager of a local care provider. The thematic analysis of participant views of connect behaviour generated five superordinate themes of ‘pragmatic’, ‘enabling’, ‘validation of effort’, ‘perceived lack of flexibility’ and ‘areas for development’. Further inquiry of themes highlighted subthemes of Connect Behaviour being ‘sensible’, ‘practical’, ‘collaborative’, ‘holistic’ and ‘action’. Conversely, some perceived a lack of flexibility in the care planning tool. Future areas for development were also identified in the data. Changes were recommended to increase the tool accessibility for people with intellectual disabilities, support stakeholders understanding of the tool, and consider utility for other clinical scenarios. Conclusions The evaluation established general feedback to continue to use the Connect Behaviour as a care planning tool. The benefits of Connect Behaviour in comparison to other care planning frameworks needs to be understood

Flexibility (engineering · Health care · Inclusion (mineral · Intellectual disability · Medical education · Multidisciplinary approach · Qualitative research · Sociology · Superordinate goals · Thematic analysis · Down syndrome and intellectual disability research · Family and Disability Support Research · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The overlooked burden

    Open Access•Richard Laugharne, Ian Wilson et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2026

  • Textbook of Psychiatry for Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Open Access•Shoumitro Shoumi Deb, Marco O Bertelli et al.•Textbook of Psychiatry for…•2022

  • In the Field

    Robert G Burgess•In the Field•2002

  • Using Templates in the Thematic Analysis of Text

    Noemia King, Nigel King•Essential Guide to Qualitative…•2004

  • Facilitators and barriers for co‐ordinated multi‐agency services

    Open Access•Patricia Sloper•Child Care Health and Development•2004

  • Thematic Analysis

    Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•QMiP Bulletin•2022

  • Measuring Consumer Participation in Mental Health Services

    Open Access•Hugh Kent, John Read•International Journal of Social…•1998

  • Qualitative interviews in psychology

    J Potter, A Hepburn•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2005

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The qualitative research interview

    Open Access•Barbara Dicicco-Bloom, Barbara DiCicco‐Bloom et al.•Medical Education•2006

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae