Strategic responses of NGOs to the new party-building campaign in China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7271920 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lin Nie (0000-0002-1971-667X, University of Hong Kong), Jie Wu (0000-0002-1389-6964, Fudan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 46-67 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | China Information (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0920-203X • E-ISSN: 1741-590X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0920203x21995705 |
| OpenAlex | W3134426766 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 29 |
Over the last decade, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has sought to assimilate the third sector – non-governmental organizations (NGOs) – through its party-building campaign. This article examines NGOs’ strategies in response to this campaign, based on in-depth interviews with 64 NGOs and local cadres. We find that NGOs have developed three main strategies to respond to the CCP’s attempts to penetrate their organizations. First, NGOs embedded in the party-state system and those affiliated with private enterprises tend to acquiesce to party building out of habit and for compliance reasons, respectively. Second, those with multiple stakeholders generally compromise in the party-building process, acting as passive compliers if they depend more on non-state resources, or active players if they rely more on state resources. Third, civic NGOs that advocate causes inconsistent with the ruling regime might avoid party building as a resistant strategy, by either disguising their nonconformity or escaping from the control of the ruling regime entirely. NGOs’ strategic responses are contingent on their negotiating power, which results from their resource dependence and the party’s enforcement dilemmas. This article contributes to our understanding of the recent party-building campaign from an institutional perspective, and enriches our knowledge about relations between the party and the third sector
Business · China · Communism · Compromise · Control (management · Economics · Enforcement · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Public relations · Sociology · State (computer science · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · International Development and Aid · Law · Public Administration
Following the Dragon
How Does an Authoritarian State Co-opt Its Social Scientists Studying Civil Society
Going Plant-Forward? Dietary Publics and Plant-Based Lifestyle Advocacy in Contemporary China
Party-building and Government Funding
Bridging State and Nonprofit
The CCP, Campaign Governance and Covid-19
Local lobbying in single-party authoritarian systems
Stay or exit
Do Regulations Enhance Civil Servants' Trust in NGO Contractors for Public Service Innovation? A Comparative Analysis of Conjoint Experiments in China
Symbolic Bureaucratic Representation and Client Cooperation
Neither Withdrawal nor Resistance
Participatory budgeting and the party
Governing nonprofits under competing institutional logics
Organizations
Negotiating the State
An Institutional Approach to Chinese NGOs
China's “Soft” Centralization
The Political Economy of Social Organization Registration in China
Post-Earthquake Relief and Reconstruction Efforts
“Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Organizational environments
The Governance of NGOs in China since 1978
Civil Society In China
An Emerging Civil Society
Transnational Environmental Movement
Between Control and Empowerment
Fields, Organizations, and Agency
The External Control of Organizations
Asserting Difference
Friends with Benefits
Embedded Government Control and Nonprofit Revenue Growth
Fragmented control
Rethinking Civil Society
The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence
The Iron Cage Revisited
State-society relations under a new model of control in China
Institutionalized Organizations
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |