Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Opposition party policy shifts in response to no‐confidence motions

Bibliographic Data

ID7286229
AuthorsZeynep Somer-Topcu (0000-0001-7499-5571, Vanderbilt University), Zeynep Somer‐topcu (Department of Political Science Vanderbilt University USA), Laron K Williams (0009-0009-6584-5534, Department of Political Science University of Missouri USA), Laron Williams (University of Missouri)
Year2013
Volume53
Issue3
Pages600-616
Publication date2013-11-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Political Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0304-4130 • E-ISSN: 1475-6765
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1475-6765.12038
OpenAlexW2100279090
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited48

No‐confidence motions ( NCMs ) are attempts by opposition parties to publicise the government's failings in a salient policy arena, and previous research has shown that they often negatively affect citizens' evaluations of governing parties' competence and damage their electoral prospects. Yet currently there is a lack of understanding of how opposition parties respond ideologically to these NCMs . It is argued in this article that opposition parties should distance themselves from the government challenged by NCMs to show that they are different from the incompetent government and to compete for the votes that the government is likely to lose. Using a sample of 19 advanced democracies from 1970–2007, empirical evidence is presented that NCMs encourage political parties to move their positions away from the government's position, especially in the presence of reinforcing negative signals about government performance. These results have important implications for our understanding of opposition party policy change, for the economic voting literature, and for the spatial and valence models of party competition

Competence (human resources · Economics · Ideology · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Salient · Voting · Voting behavior · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Social Psychology

  • Why Do Political Parties Change their Policy Positions? A Review

    Open Access•Andreas Fagerholm•Political Studies Review•2016

  • Are some parties immune from scandal? Party family, scandal exposure, and party evaluation

    Debra Leiter, Greg Vonnahme et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2025

  • A Credible Change

    Mathias Bukh Vestergaard•Political Communication•2026

  • Constitutional parliamentarism in Europe, 1800–2019

    Open Access•José Antônio Cheibub, Bjørn Erik Rasch•West European Politics•2021

  • Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections

    James Adams, James E Adams•Annual Review of Political Science•2012

  • Beyond the distinction between incumbency and opposition

    Open Access•Dieter Stiers•Party Politics•2019

  • How party competition shapes ethnic parties’ positions on migration and immigration

    Open Access•Marc Debus, Felix Schulte•Party Politics•2024

  • Cabinet Reshuffles and Parliamentary No-Confidence Motions

    Open Access•Thomas G Fleming, Bastián González‐bustamante et al.•Government and Opposition•2024

  • It's all relative

    Open Access•Laron K Williams, Laron Williams•European Journal of Political…•2015

  • Too Legit to Quit? Analyzing the Effect of No-Confidence Motions on Cabinet Members' Instability in Presidential Systems

    Open Access•Jhon Kelly Bonilla-Aranzales•Latin American Politics and Society•2023

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Party Policy in Modern Democracies

    Kenneth Benoit, Michael Laver•Party Policy in Modern Democracies•2006

  • Party Government in 48 Democracies (1945–1998)

    Open Access•Jaap Woldendorp, Hans Keman et al.•Party Government in 48 Democracies•2000

  • Performance Politics and the British Voter

    Open Access•Harold D Clarke, David Sanders et al.•Performance Politics and the…•2009

  • A Unified Theory of Party Competition

    Open Access•James Adams, James F Adams et al.•Unified Theory of Party Competition•2005

  • Do Parties Make a Difference?

    Open Access•Richard Rose•Do Parties Make a Difference?•1980

  • Mapping Policy Preferences

    Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann et al.•Mapping policy preferences•2001

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Issue Evolution

    E G Carmines, James A Stimson•Issue Evolution•2020

  • Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements During Elections

    Open Access•James Adams, James E Adams et al.•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Issues, the Spatial Theory of Voting, and British General Elections

    Open Access•Sungdai Cho, James W Endersby•Public Choice•2003

  • Valence and electoral outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998

    Open Access•Michael Clark•Electoral Studies•2009

  • Does the Ideological Dispersion of Parties Mediate the Electoral Impact of Valence? A Cross-National Study of Party Support in Nine Western European Democracies

    Open Access•Michael Clark, Debra Leiter•Comparative Political Studies•2014

  • Scandal Fatigue? Scandal Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe, 1977–2007

    Open Access•Staffan Kumlin, Peter Esaiasson•British Journal of Political…•2012

  • Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976–1998

    Open Access•James Adams, James E Adams et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts

    Open Access•James Adams, Zeynep Somer-Topcu•British Journal of Political…•2009

  • Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Timely Decisions

    Zeynep Somer-Topcu•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Judging Inflation and Unemployment

    Pamela Johnston Conover, Stanley Feldman et al.•The Journal of Politics•1986

  • Polarization of What? A Model of Elections with Endogenous Valence

    Gilles Serra•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • The Value of Biased Information

    Randall L Calvert•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation

    Open Access•Lawrence Ezrow, Catherine E De Vries et al.•Party Politics•2011

  • Valence Competition in the Spatial Stochastic Model

    Open Access•Norman Schofield•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2003

  • Modeling the interaction of parties, activists and voters

    Open Access•Norman Schofield, Itai Sened•European Journal of Political…•2005

  • Unsuccessful Success? Failed No-Confidence Motions, Competence Signals, and Electoral Support

    Open Access•Laron K Williams, Laron Williams•Comparative Political Studies•2011

  • Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes

    Michael S Lewis-Beck, Mary Stegmaier•Annual Review of Political Science•2000

  • Treating Words as Data with Error

    Open Access•Kenneth Benoit, Michael Laver et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions

    Raymond M Duch, Raymond Duch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies

    André Blais, Donald Blake et al.•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage

    Tim Groseclose•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition

    Open Access•Ian Budge•British Journal of Political…•1994

  • Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies

    Open Access•James Adams, Michael Clark et al.•British Journal of Political…•2004

  • Parties' Policy Programmes and the Dog that Didn't Bark

    Open Access•Lawrence Ezrow•British Journal of Political…•2008

  • The Moving Centre

    Open Access•John Bartle, Sebastian Dellepiane-Avellaneda et al.•British Journal of Political…•2011

  • Policy-Seeking Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy with Proportional Representation

    Open Access•James Adams, Samuel Merrill et al.•British Journal of Political…•2009

  • Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies

    Open Access•John D Huber, John Huber et al.•Party Politics•1995

  • Greece

    Open Access•Panayote Elias Dimitras•Electoral Studies•1994

  • Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, Jonathan Nagler et al.•American Political Science Review•2000

  • The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•John D Huber•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Spatial Models of Party Competition

    Open Access•Donald E Stokes, Donald Stokes•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Out of Step, Out of Office

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•2002

  • Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data

    Michael Laver, Kenneth Benoit et al.•American Political Science Review•2003

  • Resurgent Mass Partisanship

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington•American Political Science Review•2001

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,71
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae