Aligning police practice with hate crime theory

The case for using risk assessments to improve police response to victims of hate

Bibliographic Data

ID7301765
AuthorsLoretta Trickett (0000-0003-4948-4088, Nottingham Trent University), Timothy Bryan (0000-0003-4287-3566, University of Toronto)
Year2024
Volume31
Issue1
Pages22-38
Publication date2024-09-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Victimology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-7580 • E-ISSN: 2047-9433
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/02697580241279607
OpenAlexW4402789326
LanguageEN
References cited25

In England and Wales, police forces have been urged to improve their response to victims. Despite this, many victims continue not to report to police, and those that do often report distrust and dissatisfaction with police response. Across the hate crime strands, victims have little confidence in the capacity of police to act empathetically, to respond to hate crime effectively, or to take hate crime victimisation seriously. In this paper, we argue that risk assessments (RAs) represent a useful tool to bridge the gap between the reality of hate crime victimisation and current practice. We suggest that RAs – tools designed to assess a victim’s risk of potential future victimisation – can not only help the police to implement safeguarding but also provide a fuller understanding of the impact and harms of hate crime, so that police have a more holistic perspective. The use of RA may ensure that victim perspectives remain at the centre of police response

Computer security · Criminology · Hate crime · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Political science · Suicide prevention · Computer Science · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Homelessness and Social Issues · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Law · Medicine · Psychology

Tools

Open DOI