To Democratize or to Protect? How the Response to Anti‐System Parties Reshapes the EU's Transnational Party System

Bibliographic Data

ID7311069
AuthorsLudvig Norman (0000-0002-4547-1661, Stockholm University Stockholm, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume59
Issue3
Pages721-737
Publication date2021-01-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9886 • E-ISSN: 1468-5965
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jcms.13128
OpenAlexW3124072776
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited40

This article studies how efforts to democratize the European Union's (EU) decision‐making procedures are reshaped by the growing influence of anti‐system parties in Europe. This new political landscape exacerbates a fundamental democratic dilemma for the EU: to either open up, and further democratize its institutions or to work to protect those institutions from the influence of anti‐systemic actors. The article analyses how political elites engage with this dilemma by studying a process unfolding from 2010 to 2019 through which reforms to the EU's transnational party system were introduced. Building on extensive interview and debate data the analysis demonstrates that, while a democratizing logic informed early stages of the process, a protective logic gradually became dominant. The article goes on to discuss the possible implications of this shift for the continued democratization of the EU and identifies this dimension in EU politics as a pertinent field for further study

Democracy · Democratization · Dilemma · Dimension (graph theory · Economics · European union · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access