Renewable Energy Targets and Policies in Traditional Oil-Producing Countries
A Comparison of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7314017 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Farid Guliyev (0000-0003-4807-8547, Khazar University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 110-124 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Eurasian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1879-3665 • E-ISSN: 1879-3673 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/18793665231177720 |
| OpenAlex | W4377287619 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 32 |
The clean energy transition has entered the policy discourse and government agenda of the Caspian oil-producing countries of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. Both countries have set a target to increase the share of renewable energy sources (RES) in total energy production by 2030. This article presents a comparative analysis of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan in their paths to a low-carbon sources of energy covering the status of RES, renewable energy targets, and the role of government policy schemes in promoting renewable energy (RE) deployment. The study shows that despite some commonalities in the initial conditions (such as Soviet-era legacies of fossil-fuel-based infrastructure, a high degree of dependence on oil and gas rents, and dominance of state-owned enterprises), Kazakhstan adopted a more targeted regulatory framework and more elaborate policy schemes with regards to renewables than Azerbaijan did. In the latter case, the introduction of relevant renewable legislation has been significantly delayed or implemented only partially. As a result, Kazakhstan has performed relatively more successfully on advancing non-conventional renewable energy targets: non-hydro renewable sources accounted for 3% of total electricity generated in Kazakhstan and made up only 1% of electricity produced in Azerbaijan (as of 2020). This article highlights the following factors that stand out in explaining these variable outcomes: the degree of economic liberalization, quality of governance of the oil and gas sector, regulatory frameworks, and policy support schemes
Business · Dominance (genetics · Economic policy · Economic rent · Economics · Economy · Electricity · Energy policy · Energy subsidies · Environmental protection · Feed-in tariff · Fossil fuel · Geography · Liberalization · Market economy · Natural resource economics · Renewable energy · Engineering · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Global Energy Security and Policy · Natural Resources and Economic Development
An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models
Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization
The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy
Understanding carbon lock-in
The need for comprehensive and well targeted instrument mixes to stimulate energy transitions
Institutions and the Resource Curse
How oil autocracies learn to stop worrying
Models, Numbers and Cases
Prelude to the Resource Curse
Policy invention as evolutionary tinkering and codification
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |