Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tactical and Contextual Determinants of U.S. Senators' Approval Ratings

Bibliographic Data

ID7329618
AuthorsBrian F Schaffner, Bertram Schaffner (0000-0003-1953-2464, Western Michigan University), Wendy J Schiller (0000-0002-6296-8725, Brown University), Patrick J Sellers (0000-0002-0053-8826), Patrick Sellers (Davidson College)
Year2003
Volume28
Issue2
Pages203-223
Publication date2003-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3162/036298003x200863
OpenAlexW2142575217
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited21

This paper focuses on U.S. senators and their home‐state approval ratings from 1981 to 1997. We examine these ratings to assess the relative impacts of tactical factors, such as the senators' bill sponsorship and media activity, and contextual influences, such as economic performance, state population size, and the evaluations and behavior of other elected officials. We find that the senators' own tactical behavior affects the approval ratings, but a stronger influence is the context in which the senators operate

Business · Context (archaeology · Economics · Geography · Political science · Population · Public economics · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Demography · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • The American Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith et al.•American Congress•2011

  • We Have It Totally Under Control? Exploring the Effects of Ideology and Knowing Someone Diagnosed With Covid-19 on Evaluations of President Trump’s Leadership on the Pandemic

    Open Access•Jason S Byers, Laine P Shay•American Politics Research•2021

  • Our State’s Never Had Better Friends

    Open Access•David C W Parker, Craig Goodman•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Holding agencies accountable

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, Alexander I Ruder et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2020

  • Partisan Alignment, Performance, and Citizen Approval of Political Actors

    Open Access•Daniel Lyons, Daniel J Lyons et al.•American Politics Research•2019

  • Inferences Made Easy

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•American Politics Research•2016

  • Political Alliance Formation and Cooperation Networks in the Utah State Legislature

    Open Access•C Amelia Davis, D Redhead et al.•Human Nature•2022

  • How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer, Messing et al.•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Senate Elections

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Alan Abramowitz et al.•Senate elections•1992

  • Partners and Rivals

    Open Access•Wendy J Schiller•Partners and Rivals•2000

  • The Movers and the Shirkers

    Open Access•Eric M Uslaner, Eric Uslaner•The movers and the shirkers•1999

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • When Objectivity is Not Objective

    James H Kuklinski, Lee Sigelman•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Gubernatorial, Senatorial, and State-level Presidential Job Approval

    Open Access•Thad L Beyle, Richard G Niemi et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2002

  • Television Markets and U. S. Senate Elections

    Open Access•Charles Stewart Iii, C Neal Stewart et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Constituency Population and Representation in the U. S. Senate

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, John R Alford•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • State Population and the Electoral Success of U.S. Senators

    John R Hibbing, Sara L Brande et al.•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Washington Behavior and Home-State Reputation

    Open Access•Barbara Sinclair•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • State-Level Presidential Approval and Senatorial Support

    Open Access•Jeffrey E Cohen, Jon R Bond et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Senators' Home-State Reputations

    Open Access•Sarah Binder, Forrest Maltzman et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1998

  • Problems of Comparability and Inference Using the CPS 1972 Election Study

    Stephen C Craig, Thomas L Hurley•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis

    Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Making the Most of Statistical Analyses

    Gary King, Michael Tomz et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Senators as Political Entrepreneurs

    Wendy J Schiller•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Strategy and Choice in the 1982 Congressional Elections

    Gary C Jacobson, Samuel Kernell•PS Political Science & Politics•1982

  • Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress

    Open Access•Robert Weissberg•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections

    Open Access•Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns

    Open Access•Patrick J Sellers, Patrick Sellers•American Political Science Review•1998

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,53
Citation span2011 - 2022 (12)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae