Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Inferences Made Easy

Partisan Voting in Congress, Voter Awareness, and Senator Approval

Bibliographic Data

ID6179619
AuthorsLogan Dancey (0000-0002-5348-5369, Wesleyan University, corresponding author), Geoffrey Sheagley (0000-0002-1743-6201, University of Minnesota, Duluth)
Year2016
Volume44
Issue5
Pages844-874
Publication date2016-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Politics Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1532673x16630378
OpenAlexW2274074601
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited46

This article investigates whether constituents are able to accurately infer their senators’ votes when the senator frequently votes against the party line. We find that when senators repeatedly vote against the party line, constituents’ ability to correctly identify their senators’ votes drops precipitously while levels of misinformation rise. We then show that citizens represented by senators who tend to vote against the party line are also less able to connect their policy positions with their evaluations of those senators. These findings indicate that there is substantial variation across senators in the ability of their constituents to hold them accountable for their votes while in office. Constituents simply know less about the positions taken by moderate senators and have a harder time aligning their levels of policy agreement with a senator with their evaluation of that senator if she frequently votes against her party

Contingent vote · Economics · Group voting ticket · Law and economics · Misinformation · Political science · Politics · Spoilt vote · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Elections, competition, and constituent evaluations of U.S. senators

    Open Access•James Sievert, Ryan D Williamson•Electoral Studies•2022

  • From Wedge Issue to Partisan Divide

    Open Access•James G Gimpel•The Forum•2019

  • The effect of cross-cutting partisan debates on political decision-making

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley•Party Politics•2017

  • An Assessment of Citizens' Capacity for Prospective Issue Voting using Incentivized Forecasting

    Libby Jenke, Christian D Johnston et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2025

  • Breaking Down Bipartisanship

    Celia Paris•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  • The Supreme Court as an electoral issue

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Elizabeth N Simas et al.•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • The politics of accountability in Supreme Court nominations

    Open Access•Lilas Ba, Leeann Ba et al.•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • Partisanship and Perceptions of Party-Line Voting in Congress

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Typecast

    Open Access•Douglas J Ahler, Gaurav Sood•Political Behavior•2023

  • What Goes with Red and Blue? Mapping Partisan and Ideological Associations in the Minds of Voters

    Open Access•Stephen N Goggin, John Henderson et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • Yea or Nay

    Open Access•Christopher P Donnelly•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • How Filibuster Rhetoric Informs Perceptions of Politicians

    Open Access•Kevin K Banda, James Sievert et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Congressional Representation

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Shiro Kuriwaki•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • What Americans know about politics and why it matters

    Michael X Delli Carpini•What Americans know about…•1996

  • On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals

    Nathaniel Schenker, Jane F Gentleman•The American Statistician•2001

  • The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick J Kenney•Spectacle of U. S. Senate Campaigns•2021

  • It's Even Worse Than It Looks

    Open Access•Gerald M Pomper•Political Science Quarterly•2013

  • Tactical and Contextual Determinants of U.S. Senators' Approval Ratings

    Open Access•Brian F Schaffner, Bertram Schaffner et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Information, Recall, and Accountability

    Open Access•Robin M Wolpert, James G Gimpel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • Proximity voting in the 2010 U.S. House elections

    Elizabeth N Simas•Electoral Studies•2013

  • Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll‐Call Voting

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Philip Edward Jones•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Political Context, Issue Salience, and Selective Attentiveness

    Vincent L Hutchings•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • Which Buck Stops Here? Accountability for Policy Positions and Policy Outcomes in Congress

    Philip Edward Jones•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Reassessing Proximity Voting

    Danielle A Joesten, Danielle Joesten et al.•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees

    Jonathan P Kastellec, Jeffrey R Lax et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns

    Kim Fridkin, Kim L Fridkin et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Candidates, Issues and Voters

    Stanley Feldman, Pamela Johnston Conover•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Party, Performance, and Strategic Politicians

    Open Access•Adam R Brown, Gary C Jacobson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2008

  • Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data

    Open Access•David Primo, David M Primo et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2007

  • What Gets Rewarded? Legislative Activity and Constituency Approval

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin, Paul Testa et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2015

  • Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship

    Open Access•Noam Lupu•Political Behavior•2015

  • Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters

    Open Access•Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky•Political Behavior•2010

  • The perils of presidential support

    Open Access•D Brady, David W Brady et al.•Political Behavior•1996

  • The Effect of Political Competition on Democratic Accountability

    Open Access•Philip Edward Jones•Political Behavior•2013

  • Job Approval and Senate Election Outcomes In the United States

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Constituents and Legislators

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, Paul Gronke•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1996

  • Senators' Home-State Reputations

    Open Access•Sarah Binder, Forrest Maltzman et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1998

  • Concordance and Projection in Citizen Perceptions of Congressional Roll-Call Voting

    Open Access•J Matthew Wilson, Paul Gronke•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections

    Thomas M Carsey, Gerald C Wright et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Heuristics Behaving Badly

    Open Access•Logan Dancey, Geoffrey Sheagley•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World

    Pamela Johnston Conover, Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge, N Malhotra•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Gregory Koger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Dynamics of Partisan Conflict on Congressional Approval

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • One Vote Out of Step? The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Eric Mcghee et al.•American Politics Research•2012

  • Strategic Party Government and the 2010 Elections

    Open Access•Gregory Koger, Matthew J Lebo•American Politics Research•2012

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Leapfrog Representation and Extremism

    Open Access•Joseph Bafumi, Michael C Herron•American Political Science Review•2010

  • The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting

    Open Access•Robert S Erickson•American Political Science Review•1971

  • Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections

    Open Access•Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Explaining Senate Election Outcomes

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Economic and Referendum Voting

    Open Access•Lonna Rae Atkeson, Randall W Partin•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Political Science and World Stabilization

    Open Access•Quincy Wright•American Political Science Review•1950

  • Out of Step, Out of Office

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•2002

  • Resurgent Mass Partisanship

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington•American Political Science Review•2001

  • The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Robert P Van Houweling•American Political Science Review•2009

Unique citing works13
Citations per year1,44
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae