Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Government Growth and Professionalism in U.S. State Legislatures

Bibliographic Data

ID7329627
AuthorsN Malhotra (0000-0003-4477-6049, Stanford University, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume31
Issue4
Pages563-584
Publication date2006-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3162/036298006x201931
OpenAlexW2091611077
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited43

This article analyzes the professionalization of American state legislatures since the 1960s and expands on previous studies by considering the strategic incentives of members. Fiorina and Noll's (1978a, 1978b) theory that reelection‐minded legislators serve as “ombudsmen to the bureaucracy” on behalf of their constituents suggests that legislatures have professionalized in response to growth in public spending in order to strengthen members' abilities to handle increased facilitation duties. I used longitudinal analysis and instrumental variables regression to test this hypothesis and disentangle causal directionality, since professional legislators may have the means and incentive to spend more than their citizen counterparts. Both methods revealed empirical support for the Fiorina and Noll hypothesis that spending increases caused legislators to become more professional

Bureaucracy · Economics · Government (linguistics · Incentive · Legislature · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Professionalization · State (computer science · Test (biology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Court-ordered redistricting and the law of 1/n

    Open Access•Dongwon Lee, Sangwon Park•Public Choice•2018

  • More Laws, More Growth? Evidence from US States

    Elliott Ash, Massimo Morelli et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2025

  • A Squire Index Update

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2017

  • Should We Measure Professionalism with an Index? A Note on Theory and Practice in State Legislative Professionalism Research

    Open Access•Daniel Bowen, Zachary David Greene•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • Concentrated Powers

    George A Krause, George Krause et al.•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The Source of the Legislative Professionalism Advantage

    Open Access•Zoe Nemerever, Daniel M Butler•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Is It Us? Is It Them? Or Is It This Place? Predicting Civility in State Legislatures

    Open Access•Jaclyn J Kettler, Loretta Fowler et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2022

  • The public‐facing policy agenda of state legislatures

    Open Access•Drexel A Peterson, Wallapak Tavanapong et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2023

  • Disentangling the Relationship between Legislative Professionalism and Government Spending

    Open Access•N Malhotra•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Constraining Executive Action

    Open Access•Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Sarah Shair‐rosenfield et al.•Governance•2017

  • Partisan Competition and the Efficiency of Lawmaking in American State Legislatures, 1991-2009

    Open Access•William D Hicks•American Politics Research•2015

  • The Law of k/n

    Open Access•Jowei Chen, N Malhotra•American Political Science Review•2007

  • The Personal Vote

    Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain et al.•Personal Vote•1987

  • Deliberate Discretion?

    Open Access•John D Huber, Charles R Shipan•Deliberate Discretion?•2002

  • Analyzing Panel Data

    Gregory B Markus, Gregory Markus•Analyzing Panel Data•1979

  • Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression

    James H Stock, James Stock et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•2002

  • A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation

    Trevor Breusch, T S Breusch et al.•Econometrica•1979

  • Invited Commentary

    M M Joffe, P R Rosenbaum•American Journal of Epidemiology•1999

  • The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions

    Guido W Imbens, G Imbens•Biometrika•2000

  • Fiscal Policy, Legislature Size, and Political Parties

    Thomas W Gilligan, John G Matsusaka•National Tax Journal•2001

  • Deviations From Constituent Interests

    Open Access•Thomas W Gilligan, John G Matsusaka•Economic Inquiry•1995

  • Causal Inference With General Treatment Regimes

    Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•Journal of the American…•2004

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  • Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects

    Stephen Nickell•Econometrica•1981

  • Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data

    Manuel Arellano, Stephen Bond•The Review of Economic Studies•1991

  • A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity

    Halbert White•Econometrica•1980

  • Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models

    Open Access•Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond•Journal of Econometrics•1998

  • Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments

    Douglas O Staiger, Douglas Staiger et al.•Econometrica•1997

  • Instrument Relevance in Multivariate Linear Models

    John Shea•The Review of Economics and…•1997

  • Former State Legislators in the U. S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Michael B Berkman, Michael Berkman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1993

  • Trends in the Partisan Composition of State Legislatures

    Open Access•Jeffrey M Stonecash, Anna M Agathangelou•American Political Science Review•1997

  • The New Federalism

    Open Access•Steve Solnick•Political Science Quarterly•1998

  • The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs

    Barry R Weingast, Kenneth A Shepsle et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1981

  • Diversity in the American States

    David R Morgan, Laura Ann Wilson•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1990

  • The Personal Vote

    Open Access•William H Flanigan•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • Changes in Professionalism in U. S. State Legislatures

    Open Access•James D King•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • State Legislators as Congressional Candidates

    Michael Berkman, James Eisenstein et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models in Political Science

    Open Access•Gregory J Wawro, Gregory Wawro•Political Analysis•2002

  • Legislative Professionalism and the Demand for Groups

    Open Access•Michael B Berkman, Michael Berkman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2001

  • Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians

    Open Access•Cherie Maestas•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Citizens, Structures, and Sister States

    Open Access•Christopher Z Mooney•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • Another Look at Legislative Professionalization and Divided Government in the States

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1997

  • Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1992

  • State Legislative Professionalism and Gubernatorial Effectiveness, 1978-1991

    Open Access•Robert Jay Dilger, George A Krause et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • Career Opportunities and Membership Stability in Legislatures

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1988

  • State Legislators in Congress

    Michael B Berkman, Michael Berkman•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • The institutionalization of the good death

    Open Access•Beverley Mcnamara, Charles Waddell et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1994

  • Divided Government in the American States

    Open Access•Morris P Fiorina•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection

    Open Access•William D Berry, Michael B Berkman et al.•American Political Science Review•2000

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,63
Citation span2007 - 2025 (19)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae