Social Equity and Social Service Productivity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7361976 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen R Chitwood (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-29 |
| Publication date | 1974-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/974398 |
| OpenAlex | W2322189919 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 2 |
15. See Manpower in the Federal (Washington D.C.: U.S. Civil Service Commission, Bureau of Executive Manpower, January 1972), pp. 2-4. 16. We avoid here the important problem of whether being color conscious or color blind enhances social equity as a related but separate question. useful and short discussion of the problem is to be found in Harold Fleming, The 'Affirmative Action' Debate, City (Summer 1972), pp. 28-31. 17. This philosophy is certainly reflected in the National Civil Service League's, A Public Personnel Administration Law (November 1970). For a discussion of the law, see Jean J. Couturier, Model Public Personnel Administration Law: ViewsPro, and Harold E. Forbes, Two Views-Con, Public Personnel Review (October 1971), pp. 202-214. Some preliminary empirical work already indicates that in the federal service graduate work beyond the bachelor's level does not have a measurable, independent effect on upward mobility . See Manpower in the Federal Servic ashington D.C : U.S. Civil Service Commission, reau of Executive Manpower, January 1972), pp. of officials who eventually attain the rank of GS-15 and above. Seniority was found to be a far more important explanatory variable, and, indeed, protracted graduate work sometimes was associated with slower upward mobility, seemingly because time spent on an advanced degree was time not spent accumulating seniority, Eugene B. McGregor, Jr., Social Equity and the Public Service, paper delivered at the 1973 National Conference on Public Administration, Los Angeles, April 1-4. 18. An excellent statement on the slippery definitions of merit can be found in Frederick C. Mosher, Democracy and the Public Service (New York: Ocford University Press, 1968), Chapter 7. 19. See Gardner, op. cit., pp. 151-159. 20. U.S. Civil Service Commission, Analysis of Data and Report on Union Recognition in the Federal (Office of Labor-Management Relations, Bulletin No. 711-27, April 13, 1973), p. 1. 21. IbiL, pp. 5-12. 22. Mosher, op. cit. icials who eventually attain the rank of GS-15 ove. Seniority was found to be a far more tant explanatory variable, and, indeed, proe graduate work sometimes was associated with upward mobil ty, seemingly because time on an advanced degree was time not spent ulating seniority, Eugene B. McGregor, Jr
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Equity (law · Market economy · Political science · Productivity · Social equality · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Social Work
Enhancing intercity transportation will improve the equitable distribution of high-quality health care in China
Prioritising development planning in the Indian semi-arid Deccan using sustainable livelihood security index approach
Social Equity, Property Rights, and Public Administrators
Taking the reins or taking the ride
From theory to practice
Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for‐profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing home quality and access
Equity in Public Services
Law versus Ethics
Social Equity
PAR ’s Social Equity Footprint
Ideology, Effectiveness, and Public Sector Productivity
Social Class and the Quality of Work Life in Public and Private Organizations
Big Questions in Administrative Ethics
Does Coproduction of Public Services Support Government's Social Equity Goals? The Case of U.S. State Parks
Children of a Lesser God
Social Equity in Professional Codes of Ethics
Considering Equity in Public Process Improvement Trainings
A equidade na implementação de políticas
Defining reading program effectiveness
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,41 |
| Citation span | 1980 - 2026 (47) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |