Making the Randomized Response Technique Work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7363094 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Zdep, S M Zdep, Isabelle N Rhodes |
| Year | 1976 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 531-531 |
| Publication date | 1976-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/268338 |
| OpenAlex | W2047705313 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
The ability of the randomized response technique to obtain sensitive information on surveys was compared to two other methods involving self-administered questionnaires. Using a national probability sample, and extending upon a number of developmental changes which have evolved over the years, the randomized response technique proved to be decidedly superior to the other methods
Physics · Randomized controlled trial · Randomized experiment · Randomized response · Sample (material · Statistics · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques · Surgery
Confidentiality Assurances and Response
Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys
Social desirability and the randomized response technique
The use of survey research to estimate trends in non-compliance with federal income taxes
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research
A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response Method
Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys
Measuring associations with randomized response
RRT Meets RDD
The Validity of the Randomized Response Technique
Measuring social indicators in opinion surveys
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,23 |
| Citation span | 1979 - 2013 (35) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |