Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

State Merit Amicus Participation and Federalism Outcomes in the U.S. Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID7364151
AuthorsSean Nicholson-Crotty, Sean Nicholson‐crotty (0000-0003-2297-6939, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume37
Issue4
Pages599-612
Publication date2007-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublius The Journal of Federalism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0048-5950 • E-ISSN: 1747-7107
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/publius/pjm017
OpenAlexW1972613527
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited15

Research suggests that merit amicus curiae participation correlates with Supreme Court decision making and that states make frequent and effective use of this tool. To date, however, no study has adequately examined the relationship between state amicus participation and the federalism values reflected in the Court's decisions. This article dev"Lelops and finds evidence for the assertion that, when they cooperate in the amicus process, state participation is associated with an increase in the likelihood of rulings favoring state rather than national government power

Federalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Law

  • Judicial Behavior and the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Revolution

    Open Access•Kevin M Scott•American Politics Research•2008

  • State Coalitions, Informational Signals, and Success as Amicus Curiae at the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kayla S Canelo•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • The "L" Word

    Jocelyn Devance Taliaferro, Nicole Ruggiano•The Journal of Sociology & Social…•2013

  • The Use of Amicus Briefs

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2018

  • National Policy Preferences and Judicial Review of State Statutes at the United States Supreme Court

    Stefanie A Lindquist, Pamela C Corley•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2012

  • Friends of the Circuits

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2010

  • State Coordinating Institutions and Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Greg Goelzhauser, Nicole Vouvalis•American Politics Research•2013

  • State Litigation during the Obama Administration

    Paul Nolette•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2014

  • Amicus Coalition Heterogeneity and Signaling Credibility in Supreme Court Agenda Setting

    Greg Goelzhauser, Nicole Vouvalis•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2015

  • The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on the Supreme Court

    Joseph D Kearney, Thomas W Merrill•University of Pennsylvania Law…•2000

  • Friends of the Court

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins•Law & Society Review•2004

  • Federalism Outcomes and Ideological Preferences

    Brady Baybeck, W R Lowry•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2000

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • Governmental Litigants, Underdogs, and Civil Liberties in the Supreme Court

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Supreme Court Decision Making

    Richard C Kearney, Reginald S Sheehan•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Repeat Players in the Supreme Court

    Kevin T Mcguire•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Amici Curiae before the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • The Rehnquist Court and Federal Preemption

    Dai O’brien•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1993

  • Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court

    James F Spriggs, Paul J Wahlbeck•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • The Institutional Sources of State Success in Federalism Litigation before the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Paul Chen, Paul H S Chen•Law & Policy•2003

  • Friends as Foes

    Open Access•Gregg Ivers, Karen O''Connor et al.•Law & Policy•1987

  • Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2008 - 2020 (13)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae