Symposium Introduction - Issues of Validity
Behavioral Concepts, Their Derivation and Interpretation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7441963 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Janice M Morse (0000-0002-9017-1940), Judith E Hupcey (0000-0003-2171-0979), Janice Penrod, Jude Spiers (0000-0002-8087-2559), Jude A Spiers, Charlotte Pooler (0000-0003-1186-9142), Carl Mitcham (0000-0003-4199-5940) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 26-27 |
| Publication date | 2002-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/160940690200100403 |
| OpenAlex | W4251909684 |
| Language | EN |
Qualitative inquiry that commences with the concept, rather than the phenomenon itself, is subject to violating the tenet of induction, thus is exposed to particular threats of invalidity. In this symposium, using the examples of the concepts of uncertainty, trust, vulnerability and suffering, and interview and videotaped data, we discuss strategies to maintain the inductive thrust, and hence validity, during data analysis. The authors present the use of a skeletal framework and scaffold as techniques to “frame” the concept, while, at the same time, continuing to further develop the concept
Computer security · Epistemology · Frame (networking · Interpretation (philosophy · Management science · Phenomenon · Subject (documents · Vulnerability (computing · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |