Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The effects of winning experience and gain/loss frames on lying decisions

A lab experiment

Bibliographic Data

ID7472115
AuthorsFang Liu (0000-0002-7132-354X, Division of Economics, School of Social Sciences Nanyang Technological University Singapore, corresponding author), Yohanes E Riyanto (0000-0001-7343-4043, Division of Economics, School of Social Sciences Nanyang Technological University Singapore)
Year2026
Volume75
Issue1
Publication date2026-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueApplied Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-994X • E-ISSN: 1464-0597
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/apps.70054
OpenAlexW7117317738
LanguageEN
References cited31

Using a laboratory experiment, we examine lying behavior among subjects, both with and without winning experience, in loss and gain frames. Our findings reveal that winning experience results in increased lying behavior in the loss frame but decreased lying behavior in the gain frame. A key factor in understanding this outcome is the subject's sense of deservingness. Winning a competition heightens subjects' feelings of deservingness, influencing the subjects' lying decisions. Additionally, we found that winners are more likely to cheat in the loss frame than in the gain frame; no similar effect was observed among subjects without winning experience

Competition (biology · Feeling · Frame (networking · Lying · Outcome (game theory · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

  • From Social Inequality to Personal Entitlement

    Brenda Major•Advances in Experimental Social…•1994

  • Honesty Requires Time (and Lack of Justifications)

    Open Access•Shaul Shalvi, Ori Eldar et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • Justified ethicality

    Open Access•Shaul Shalvi, Jason Dana et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2011

  • Preferences for Truth‐Telling

    Johannes Abeler, Daniele Nosenzo et al.•Econometrica•2019

  • The Dishonesty of Honest People

    Open Access•Nina Mazar, On Amir et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2008

  • Self-Serving Justifications

    Open Access•Shaul Shalvi, Francesca Gino et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2015

  • The Dark Side of Competition for Status

    Open Access•Gary Charne, Gary Charness et al.•Management Science•2014

  • Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics

    Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•The Journal of Business•1986

  • The collaborative roots of corruption

    Open Access•Ori Weisel, Shaul Shalvi•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • Hardnose the Dictator

    Todd L Cherry, Peter Frykblom et al.•American Economic Review•2002

  • Z-Tree

    Open Access•Urs Fischbacher•Experimental Economics•2007

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Cognitive load promotes honesty

    Open Access•Moritz Reis, Roland Pfister et al.•Psychological Research•2023

  • No gain without pain

    Open Access•Isabel Thielmann, Benjamin E Hilbig•Journal of Economic Psychology•2019

  • Does competition enhance performance or cheating? A laboratory experiment

    Open Access•Christiane Schwieren, Doris Weichselbaumer•Journal of Economic Psychology•2010

  • On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games

    John A List•Journal of Political Economy•2007

  • Social comparison processes and judgments of entitlement and satisfaction

    Open Access•Brenda Major, Maria Testa•Journal of Experimental Social…•1989

  • Victim entitlement to behave selfishly

    Emily M Zitek, Emily Zitek et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae