The Shentong Tradition and Classical Theism
A Synthesis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7474102 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tyler Dalton Mcnabb (0000-0002-2169-0560, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 186-193 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy East and West (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8221 • E-ISSN: 1529-1898 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2026.a982509 |
| OpenAlex | W7128916873 |
| Language | EN |
McNabb and Baldwin have recently argued that Classical Theism and Buddhism can be rendered in a logically consistent way. That is, one could theoretically endorse the theses of Classical Theism and the metaphysical theses of what they call mere Buddhism. One criticism of their project goes like this: McNabb and Baldwin's project, typical of analytic philosophy, is ahistorical. While McNabb and Baldwin's argument might go through with respect to some very generalized form of Buddhism, McNabb and Baldwin don't show that actual Buddhists who belong to robust Buddhist traditions can adhere to theism. In this article, I put forward the hypothesis that the Shentong tradition shows promise as an actual Buddhist tradition that is consistent with Classical Theism
Argument (complex analysis · Buddhism · Criticism · Metaphysics · Theism · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Highly cited | No |
|---|