Bridging the divide
Using metacognitive training to reduce hostility between the political left and right
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7474158 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steffen Möritz (0000-0002-0085-1804, Universität Hamburg, corresponding author), Lisa Borgmann (0009-0009-3975-8402, Universität Hamburg), Taryn Fritz (0000-0002-1854-6269, Behavioral Health Technology, Universität Augsburg Augsburg Germany), Tanja M Fritz (University of Augsburg), Anja S Göritz (0000-0002-4638-0489, University of Augsburg), Klaus Michael Reininger (0000-0002-6671-0465, Universität Hamburg) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/pops.70118 |
| OpenAlex | W7128522033 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
The study aimed at reducing the propensity for violence among supporters of left‐wing parties toward the right‐wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) as well as supporters of the AfD toward the German left‐wing Green Party (Die Grünen) using metacognitive training (MCT). A total of 1025 German participants were recruited online. Participants' political orientation and attitude toward the Green Party and the AfD were assessed using questionnaires. The MCT intervention asked participants seemingly simple questions that evoked common stereotypes and then presented the correct counter‐stereotypical answers alongside explanations. The study used a pre–post design to measure changes in political polarization. Hostile attitudes toward the opposing political camp were reduced at a small to medium effect size. Most participants felt they had learned something new from the intervention. Metacognitive variables pertaining to overconfidence predicted change. The findings suggest that MCT can reduce hostile attitudes toward an opposing political group. The study highlights the potential of MCT for reducing societal conflict by challenging stereotypes through surprising information. Studies with control groups and long‐term follow‐up are desirable. More research into the mechanisms of change is needed
Biology and political orientation · Bridging (networking · German · Hostility · Metacognition · Overconfidence effect · Politics · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Representations and Identity
Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans
Beliefs, Attitudes, and Communicative Practices of Opponents and Supporters of Covid-19 Containment Policies
The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis
Radical American Partisanship
Targeting our blind spot
The paradoxical thinking ‘sweet spot’
Diversity may help the uninterested
Metacognitive training in U.S. Republican leaners reduces polarization and fosters democratic behavior–intentions with liberals
How Education and Metacognitive Training May Ameliorate Religious Prejudices
Fostering Mutual Understanding Among Muslims and Non-Muslims Through Counterstereotypical Information
Using Attention Testing to Select Crowdsourced Workers and Research Participants
Social categorization and intergroup behaviour
Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism
Counter-stereotypes reduce emotional intergroup bias by eliciting surprise in the face of unexpected category combinations
Ignorance of critical race theory predicts White Americans’ opposition to it
The Parties in Our Heads
The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics
Intergroup relations and polarization of individual and collective judgments
The group as a polarizer of attitudes
Political Polarization and Political Violence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |