Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Platform affordances, discursive opportunities, and social media activism

A cross-platform analysis of #MeToo on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit, 2017–2020

Bibliographic Data

ID7477111
AuthorsMengyu Li (0000-0002-6791-1170, University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author), J Suk (0000-0003-4690-2395, University of Connecticut), Yini Zhang (0000-0002-2957-1590, University at Buffalo, USA), Jon C Pevehouse (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Jon Pevehouse (0000-0003-1761-0422, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Yibing Sun (0000-0002-1353-9940, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Hyerin Kwon (0000-0002-6035-4500, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Ruixue Lian (0000-0002-3919-3204, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Rui Wang (0000-0001-7155-3356, University at Buffalo, USA), Xinxia Dong (0000-0001-9748-9938, University at Buffalo, USA), Dhavan V Shah (0000-0001-5034-2816, University of Wisconsin–Madison)
Year2024
Volume28
Issue1
Pages119-147
Publication date2024-10-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Media & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14614448241285562
OpenAlexW4403872200
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited77

This study proposes affordances for discursive opportunities (ADO) as a theoretical framework that leverages the concept of technological affordances and the theory of discursive opportunities to understand platform potential in shaping social media activism. Specifically, ADO underscores how social media platform affordances (e.g., algorithmic curation, shared group identity and culture, connectivity) shape movement visibility, resonance, and legitimacy, all of which can mobilize activism efforts. We further situate our discussion in the cross-platform context to explore both differences and interconnections between different platforms in facilitating digital activism. By analyzing 20,363,128 English posts related to the #MeToo movement from 2017 to 2020 on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit using supervised machine learning and time series analysis, we reveal platform variations in affording discursive opportunities for visibility, resonance, and legitimacy, which shape activism efforts differently across platforms. We also find a unidirectional relationship from activism on Twitter and Reddit to activism on Facebook

Advertising · Affordance · Business · Human–computer interaction · Internet privacy · Media studies · Social media · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Social Media and Politics

  • Cross-platformization

    Open Access•Josephine Lukito, Yini Zhang et al.•New Media & Society•2026

  • Visual Solidarity to Sustained Action

    Open Access•Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu, Erkut Altindağ et al.•Howard Journal of Communications•2026

  • Exploring the association of social media connectivity and interactivity with ethnic polarization

    Open Access•Qurban Hussain Pamirzad, Qiang Chen•Computers in Human Behavior•2026

  • From activism to polarization

    J Suk, Yini Zhang et al.•Information Communication & Society•2025

  • Reddit users’ reactance to the 2025 CDC Data Purge

    Lili R Romann, Lexi McNamara et al.•Information Communication & Society•2026

  • The Smell of Roses

    Open Access•Noah Khan, Ezechiel Thibaud•Convergence The International…•2026

  • Political Communication Special Issue Introduction

    Josephine Lukito, Meredith L Pruden et al.•Political Communication•2026

  • Birth of a scapegoat

    Open Access•Jack G R Wippell•Political Psychology•2026

  • Does trending across platforms popularize political topics? A cross-platform spillover framework of public attention

    Open Access•Yufan Guo, Cong Lin et al.•Information Communication & Society•2026

  • Love, Spies, and Sovereignty

    Open Access•Aiden Yeh•Sexuality Research and Social…•2026

  • How does social media content go viral across platforms? Modelling the spread of Kamala is brat across X, TikTok, and Instagram

    Open Access•Emma Connolly•Journal of Information Technology…•2025

  • How Should We Study Multiple Platforms? Lessons from Deliberative Systems Theory

    Jennifer Forestal•Political Communication•2025

  • Navigating the complexity of visual misinformation

    Open Access•Jiyoung Lee, J Suk•Communication Theory•2025

  • Differential social media affordances

    Open Access•Christian Baden, Annett Heft et al.•Communication Theory•2025

  • The Tyranny of Meritocratic Nationalism

    Open Access•Chenchen Zhang, Mingqiu Zheng•Nationalities Papers•2026

  • Occupational Activism

    Open Access•Jonathan S Coley, Jessica L Schachle-Gordon•Work and Occupations•2026

  • The Platform Society

    José Van Dijck, Thomas Poell et al.•Platform Society•2018

  • Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter

    Open Access•Ferenc Huszár, Sofia Ira Ktena et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Technology affordances

    Open Access•William Gaver, William W Gaver•Proceedings of the SIGCHI…•1991

  • How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting

    Open Access•Petter Törnberg•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Social Media Elements, Ecologies, and Effects

    Joseph B Bayer, Penny Trieu et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2020

  • How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, N Malhotra et al.•Science•2023

  • The Digital Architectures of Social Media

    Open Access•Michael Bossetta•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2018

  • From Editors to Algorithms

    Michael A DeVito•Digital Journalism•2017

  • Stumbling upon news on the Internet

    Open Access•Yonghwan Kim, Hsuan-Ting Chen et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2013

  • A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization

    Open Access•Robert M Bond, Christopher J Fari et al.•Nature•2012

  • The Strength of Peripheral Networks

    Open Access•W L Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg et al.•Journal of Communication•2018

  • Adapting to Affordances and Audiences? A Cross-Platform, Multi-Modal Analysis of the Platformization of News on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter

    Open Access•Valerie Hase, Karin Boczek et al.•Digital Journalism•2023

  • Platform-dependent effects of incidental exposure to political news on political knowledge and political participation

    Open Access•Sangwon Lee, Andreas Nanz et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • When the Personal Becomes Political

    Open Access•J Suk, Yini Zhang et al.•Communication Research•2023

  • Is Information Good for Deliberation? Link-Posting in an Online Forum

    Open Access•Francesca Polletta, Pang Ching Bobby Chen et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2008

  • Using Twitter to mobilize protest action

    Yannis Theocharis, Wendell Lowe et al.•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Micro-platformization for digital activism on social media

    Jonathon Hutchinson•Information Communication & Society•2021

  • Discursive opportunity structure and the contribution of social media to the success of social movements in Indonesia

    Hamideh Molaei•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • ‘Think global, act local’

    J Suk, Yibing Sun et al.•Information Communication & Society•2024

  • ‘Joy is resistance’

    Jessica H Lu, Catherine Knight Steele•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Funeral and Instagram

    Martin Gibbs, James Meese et al.•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Easy data, same old platforms? A systematic review of digital activism methodologies

    Suay M Özkula, Paul J Reilly et al.•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Defining affordances in social media research

    Open Access•Alexander Ronzhyn, Ana Sofía Cardenal Izquierdo et al.•New Media & Society•2023

  • Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation

    Open Access•Sung Woo Yoo, Sung Woo-Yoo et al.•Communication & Society•1970

  • Social Media and Perceived Political Polarization

    Open Access•Macau K F Mak, Mengyu Li et al.•Social Media + Society•2024

  • Reactive and Asymmetric Communication Flows

    Open Access•Yini Zhang, Dhavan V Shah et al.•The International Journal of…•2022

  • Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter

    Eli Skogerbø, Arne H Krumsvik•Journalism Practice•2014

  • Networked feminism

    Verity Trott•Feminist Media Studies•2020

  • I See You, I Believe You, I Stand With You”

    Rosemary Clark•Feminist Media Studies•2019

  • Freedom from the Press

    Melissa Suran, Danielle K Brown•Journalism Studies•2015

  • Gamergate and The Fappening

    Open Access•Adrienne Massanari•New Media & Society•2015

  • Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook

    Open Access•Jean-Christophe Plantin, Carl Lagoze et al.•New Media & Society•2016

  • Affordances-in-practice

    Open Access•Elisabetta Costa•New Media & Society•2018

  • Enacting cross-platform (buy/boy)cotts

    Open Access•Hannah Poon, Tommy Tse•New Media & Society•2022

  • Incidental news exposure via social media and political participation

    Open Access•Sangwon Lee, Michael A Xenos et al.•New Media & Society•2020

  • Explicating Affordances

    Open Access•Sandra K Evans, K E Pearce et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2016

  • Media Practices, Mediation Processes, and Mediatization in the Study of Social Movements

    Open Access•Alice Mattoni, Emiliano Treré•Communication Theory•2014

  • Movements and Media as Interacting Systems

    Open Access•William A Gamson, Gadi Wolfsfeld•The Annals of the American…•1993

  • Agenda Setting through Social Media

    Open Access•Jessica T Feezell•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Multiple Opinion Climates in Online Forums

    Open Access•Elmie Nekmat, William J Gonzenbach•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2013

  • Social Media Public Opinion as Flocks in a Murmuration

    Open Access•Yini Zhang, Fan Chen et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2021

  • The effects of algorithmic content selection on user engagement with news on Twitter

    Open Access•Erwan Dujeancourt, Marcel Garz•The Information Society•2023

  • Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign

    Josephine Lukito•Political Communication•2019

  • Social Media and Political Agenda Setting

    Open Access•Fabrizio Gilardi, Theresa Gessler et al.•Political Communication•2022

  • Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere

    Moran Yarchi, Christian Baden et al.•Political Communication•2021

  • How Science Influencers Polarize Supportive and Skeptical Communities Around Politicized Science

    Sedona Chinn, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice et al.•Political Communication•2024

  • Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity

    Andrew Chadwick•Political Communication•2007

  • Political Claims Analysis

    Ruud Koopmans, P Statham•Mobilization An International…•1999

  • Contestation on Reddit, Gamergate, and movement barriers

    Bertan Buyukozturk, Shawn Gaulden et al.•Social movement studies•2018

  • The Logic of Connective Action

    W L Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg•Information Communication & Society•2012

  • Trump, Twitter, and news media responsiveness

    Open Access•Caroline Wells, Dhavan V Shah et al.•New Media & Society•2020

  • Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Andreu Casas et al.•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Toxic Social Media

    Open Access•Marcela Suárez, Yulissa Juarez et al.•Social Media + Society•2022

  • Social Media Expression, Political Extremity, and Reduced Network Interaction

    Open Access•Min-Hsin Su, J Suk et al.•Social Media + Society•2022

  • Digitally Mediated Protest

    Open Access•Emad Khazraee, Alison N Novak•Social Media + Society•2018

  • Imagined Affordance

    Open Access•Peter Nagy, Gina Neff•Social Media + Society•2015

  • Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right-Wing Violence in Germany

    Ruud Koopmans, Olzak et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2004

  • Movements and media

    Open Access•Ruud Koopmans•Theory and Society•2004

Unique citing works16
Citations per year16
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae