Peer-based research funding as a model for journalism funding
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7478486 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria Latos (0000-0001-7898-1724, TU Dortmund University, corresponding author), Frank Lobigs (0009-0002-4590-8226, TU Dortmund University), Odette Wegwarth (0000-0003-0885-2673), Holger Wormer (TU Dortmund University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 2440-2459 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-8849 • E-ISSN: 1741-3001 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14648849231215662 |
| OpenAlex | W4388723198 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 49 |
Financing high-quality journalistic reporting is becoming increasingly difficult worldwide and economic pressure has intensified in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. While numerous alternative funding possibilities are discussed, ranging from membership models to government funding, they should not compromise the highest possible independence of journalism – a premise that also applies to scientific research. Here, the state is involved in funding, but peer review models reduce funding bias. However, systematic approaches as to how established funding models in research could be transferred to journalism are lacking. We attempt such a systematic transfer using the example of the German Research Foundation ( Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG). The transfer, based on an analysis of the complex DFG funding structures, was validated in 10 interviews with experts from science, journalism and foundations. Building on this, we developed a concept for a German Journalism Foundation ( Deutsche Journalismus-gemeinschaft, DJG), which awards funding to journalists and cooperative projects based on a peer review process. The funding priorities of the proposed organization range from infrastructure support to grants for investigative skills. Thus, unlike other models, it does not focus on funding specific topics in media coverage, but on areas such as innovation support, technology implementation and training. Although the model was designed for Germany, such a systematic transfer could also be tested for other countries
Compromise · German · Government (linguistics · Journalism · Political science · Premise · Public relations · Media Influence and Politics · Media Studies and Communication · Misinformation and Its Impacts
Peer Review
La Roches Einführung in den praktischen Journalismus
Media Systems in the Digital Age
Innovation in Public Funding for Local Journalism
State Aid for Independent News Journalism in the Public Interest? A Critical Debate of Government Funding Models and Principles, the Market Failure Paradigm, and Policy Efficacy
Still Unwilling to Pay
Journalism Training Beyond Journalism Schools
Defining criteria for good environmental journalism and testing their applicability
Democracy without Journalism
A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
The performance of truth
Principles and Boundaries of Fact-checking
Frozen’ media subsidies during a time of media change
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015
Shaping strategic research
Press Coverage and Political Accountability
The essence of democratic backsliding in the European Union
Free lunch for all? – A path analysis on free mentality, paying intent and media budget for digital journalism
Media Performance
Media Work as Field Advancement
Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Frozen 2
The New Advertisers
Funding Intermediaries
Foundation Funding and the Boundaries of Journalism
The Handbook of Journalism Studies
Pioneer journalism
Journalism as a public good
Control the money, control the media
Can foundations solve the journalism crisis
How Much Democratic Backsliding
Resilience to Online Disinformation
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |