A “Deep Story” About American Journalism
Using “episodes” to explore folk theories of journalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7497004 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth Palmer (0000-0002-5373-234X, IE University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 327-344 |
| Publication date | 2017-10-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-670X • E-ISSN: 1469-9699 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1461670x.2017.1375390 |
| OpenAlex | W2761993154 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 28 |
A recent rise in anti-media political rhetoric in the United States and Europe, which aims to tap into and stoke citizens’ beliefs and attitudes about journalism, raises the stakes for understanding those beliefs and attitudes. This article explores how the “episodes” method can be used to study citizens’ “folk theories” and feelings about journalism. The method asks interviewees to describe concrete episodes in which complex, potentially abstract concepts or institutions played a role in their lives. I illustrate the method using interviews with ordinary people who were named in mainstream news stories in the US. Interviews focused on participants’ experiences as news subjects, but in discussion their more general beliefs and attitudes about journalism emerged organically. I detail two specific folk theories about journalistic ethics that interviewees embraced. First, many people felt “good” reporters should not seek out quotes to fit into stories that had largely been written already. Second, interviewees believed that journalists should take responsibility for the outcomes of their stories. I go on to describe a broader, more emotional narrative about the relationship between the news media and the citizenry that emerged in interviews. In that “deep story” citizens saw journalists more as bullies than as advocates
Feeling · Journalism · Literature · Mainstream · Media studies · Narrative · News media · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · Technical Journalism · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Law · Social Psychology
Copyright Page
When Data and Intuition Converge
Conclusion
Journalism’s Imagined Audiences
The Obstacles to Audience Engagement
Method
First Imagined, Then Pursued
Understanding News Audience Behavior
The Journalist–Audience Relationship
Dedication
The Promise of Audience Engagement
‘It’s All About Money’ – News Users’ Folk Theory of Audience Data Utilisation in Journalism
Distrust Profiles
Advancing a qualitative turn in news media trust research
Young Adults’ Folk Theories in a Fragmented Journalistic Environment. The Case of Italy
Citizen Forums
Credible, but Not for Me
Understanding news media trust through the lens of phenomenological sociology
Folk theories of fake news
Where populist citizens get the news
Everything is Biased
Unpacking news consumption and trust decisions through a folk theory approach
Expectations of journalistic actors in the digital age
Imagined Journalists
Fair and Balanced
The right to voice your opinions
Remember that?” A temporal perspective on how audiences make sense of the news
Imagined Audiences
To Me, There’s Always a Bias
Seeking the Audience for News
Talk of Love
Making News at The New York Times
Lay Theories in Law
Practicing Audience-centred Journalism Research
The Politics of Resentment
Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism
Context Matters
The Paradox of Popularity
No Newspaper is No Fun–Even Five Decades Later
Folk Theories of Journalism
Newspapers and citizenship
Journalists and Their Sources
Some Sense of Time
Al Jazeera English Online
Where once stood titans
The news-democracy narrative and the unexpected benefits of limited news consumption
Between creative and quantified audiences
Attending the news
What clicks actually mean
Contested Communicative Spaces
Tracking the Reflexivity of the (Dis)Engaged Citizen
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,63 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 29 |