To Me, There’s Always a Bias

Understanding the Public’s Folk Theories About Journalism

Bibliographic Data

ID7498121
AuthorsTamar Wilner (0000-0001-5107-6556, School of Journalism and Media, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, corresponding author), Dominique A Montiel Valle (0000-0002-5069-2063, School of Journalism and Media, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA), Gina M Masullo (0000-0002-4909-2116, School of Journalism and Media, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA)
Year2021
Volume22
Issue14
Pages1930-1946
Publication date2021-09-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournalism Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-670X • E-ISSN: 1469-9699
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1461670x.2021.1979422
OpenAlexW3201758965
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited44

This study investigates how Americans conceive of journalistic processes and how their conceptions clash with the way journalists construct their profession. We do this by interpreting data from five focus groups to explore ways the public understands journalism, through what are called folk theories. We find that participants broadly interpreted what makes a story biased – seeing common journalistic practices, such as adding context to a story, as avenues of bias. We also found that the public’s understanding of common journalistic practices, such as eyewitness interviews and investigative work, is compatible with the journalistic self-conception, but the public may attribute negative intent if they see a story that lacks these characteristics. The data show participants hold high expectations for journalism that journalists may view as unattainable

Construct (python library · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Journalism · Media studies · Political science · Sociology · Technical Journalism · Computer Science · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · History · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOI