Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences in How We Watch the News

The Impact of Processing Goals and Expertise on Evaluations of Political Actors

Bibliographic Data

ID7510340
AuthorsDavid Tewksbury (0000-0003-0606-9108, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume26
Issue1
Pages4-29
Publication date1999-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommunication Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-6502 • E-ISSN: 1552-3810
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/009365099026001002
OpenAlexW2102297719
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited19

This research explored the ways consumption goals and political expertise may influence the depth at which people process political information in television news. Participants were assigned randomly to watch a television news profile of a political candidate with the goal of either forming an evaluation or merely passing a few minutes. They then completed measures of their evaluations of the candidate, their recall of information, and their political knowledge. The results provide evidence that processing goals and political expertise can be powerful determinants of how carefully people process political information. Experts and participants with evaluation goals were more likely than were their counterparts to process the story and form evaluations systematically. This study suggests that communication researchers and political scientists need to consider audience goals and expertise in future investigations

Advertising · Business · Cognitive psychology · Consumption (sociology · Political communication · Political process · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Public relations · Recall · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Media Influence and Health · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social Media and Politics

  • Moving beyond “Just the Facts”

    Open Access•W P Eveland, Krisztina Márton et al.•Communication Research•2004

  • Learning Political Information From the News

    Open Access•Clarissa C David•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Examining Candidate Information Search Processes

    Open Access•Li-Ning Huang, Huang Li-ning•Journal of Communication•2000

  • The Face of Crime

    Open Access•M B Oliver, Ronald L Jackson et al.•Journal of Communication•2004

  • Learning about Politics From The Daily Show

    Lauren Feldman•Mass Communication & Society•2013

  • Allocating Responsibility in Multilevel Government Systems

    Traci Wilson, Traci L Wilson et al.•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Message or Medium? Campaign Learning During the 2001 British General Election

    P Norris, David Sanders•Political Communication•2003

  • Video News Releases and the Public

    Open Access•David Tewksbury, Jakob D Jensen et al.•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Audience Activity and Television News Gratifications

    Open Access•Alan M Rubin, Alan Rubin et al.•Communication Research•1987

  • Political Awareness, Elite Opinion Leadership, and the Mass Survey Response

    John Zaller•Social Cognition•1990

  • On the Varieties and Utilities of Political Expertise

    Susan T Fiske, Richard R Lau et al.•Social Cognition•1990

  • The Effects of General and Domain-Specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment

    Kathleen M Mcgraw, Neil Pinney•Social Cognition•1990

  • Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing

    Open Access•Alan M Rubin, Alan Rubin•Journal of Communication•1984

  • Model specification and theoretical development in gratifications sought and obtained research

    Lawrence A Wenner•Communication Monographs•1986

  • Category accessibility and impression formation

    Open Access•E Tory Higgins, W Steven Rholes et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1977

  • The novice and the expert

    Open Access•Susan T Fiske, Donald R Kinder et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1983

  • Audience Motivation Effects

    Open Access•Gina M Garramone•Communication Research•1984

  • Audience Activity and Gratifications

    Open Access•Mark R Levy, Sven Windahl•Communication Research•1984

  • Activation and application of political party stereotypes

    Wendy M Rahn, Katherine J Cramer•Political Communication•1996

  • Bases of political judgments

    Open Access•Ellen D B Riggle, Ellen D Riggle et al.•Political Behavior•1992

  • On-line processing in candidate evaluation

    Open Access•Kathleen M Mcgraw, Milton Lodge et al.•Political Behavior•1990

  • The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates

    Wendy M Rahn•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Category accessibility and social perception

    Thomas K Srull, Robert S Wyer•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • On the Use of the Mass Media for Important Things

    Elihu Katz, Hadassah Haas et al.•American Sociological Review•1973

  • A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice

    Open Access•Gregory B Markus, Philip E Converse•American Political Science Review•1979

  • Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page, Calvin C Jones et al.•American Political Science Review•1979

Citations per year0.31
Citation span2000 - 2014 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae