Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A functional analysis of congressional television spots, 1986–2000

Bibliographic Data

ID7511295
AuthorsLeann M Brazeal (Kansas State University, corresponding author), William L Benoit (University of Missouri)
Year2001
Volume49
Issue4
Pages436-454
Publication date2001-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommunication Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0146-3373 • E-ISSN: 1746-4102
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01463370109385640
OpenAlexW1980595805
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited43

Despite the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on television advertising in congressional campaigns, relatively little research has examined the content purchased by those advertising dollars. This study applied the Functional Theory of Political Campaign Discourse to a purposive sample of television spots from U.S. House and Senate races from 1986 to 2000. Acclaims (self‐praise: 64%) outnumbered both attacks (criticisms: 35.5%) and defenses (refutation of attacks: 0.5%). Policy utterances comprised the bulk of the discussions in the ads (70%), while character utterances appeared less frequently (30%). Past deeds of candidates were the overwhelming focus of policy discussions (81%), while personal qualities dominated the discourse on character utterances (86%). Incumbents had a strong proclivity to acclaim (79%) more than challengers (51%) whereas challengers had a tendency to attack (49%) more than incumbents (21%). Incumbents were more likely to use past deeds to acclaim, whereas challengers used past deeds to attack

Advertising · Business · Political science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Media Influence and Politics · Media Studies and Communication

  • Dark” positivity

    Open Access•Mona Dian•Party Politics•2024

  • To Tell the Truth

    Patrick Meirick, Gwendelyn S Nisbett et al.•Political Communication•2018

  • Illinois U.S. Senate Debates

    Open Access•David Airne, William L Benoit•American Behavioral Scientist•2005

  • A functional analysis of presidential television spots

    Cheolhan Lee, William L Benoit•Communication Quarterly•2004

  • Routledge Handbook of Political Advertising

    Simon S Cro, Christina Holtz Bacha et al.•Routledge Handbook of Political…•2017

  • Political Television Advertising in Campaign 2000

    David Airne, William L Benoit•Communication Quarterly•2005

  • Content analysis in communication research

    Bernard Berelson•Content analysis in communication…•1952

  • The Spot

    Edwin Diamond, Stephen Bates•The Spot•1992

  • Seeing Spots

    William L Benoit•Seeing Spots•1999

  • The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations

    Bruce E Pinkleton, Bruce Pinkleton•Journal of Advertising•1997

  • Negative Political Advertising

    Sharyne Merritt•Journal of Advertising•1984

  • Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads

    Open Access•Gina M Garramone•Journalism Quarterly•1984

  • Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities

    Ole R Holsti•Content Analysis for the Social…•1969

  • The Reasoning Voter

    Samuel L Popkin•The Reasoning Voter•1991

  • A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Educational and Psychological…•1960

  • Functions of the great debates

    William L Benoit, Allison Harthcock•Communication Monographs•1999

  • Content of Television Political Spot Ads for Female Candidates

    Open Access•James G Benze, Eugene Declercq et al.•Journalism Quarterly•1985

  • The Effects of Televised Political Ads in the 1975 Chicago Mayoral Election

    Open Access•Ronald Mulder•Journalism Quarterly•1979

  • The Content of Political Spot Ads

    Open Access•Richard A Joslyn•Journalism Quarterly•1980

  • The functional approach to presidential television spots

    Open Access•William L Benoit•Communication Studies•2001

  • Communication Styles and Female Candidates

    Open Access•Anne Johnston, Anne Barton White•Journalism Quarterly•1994

  • Acclaiming, Attacking, and Defending

    William L Benoit, Joseph R Blaney et al.•Political Communication•2000

  • Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents

    Open Access•Charles H Franklin•American Political Science Review•1991

  • The focus group method, political advertising, campaign news, and the construction of candidate images

    Montague Kern, Marion R Just et al.•Political Communication•1995

  • Incumbency and its perceived advantage

    Spencer F Tinkham, Ruth Ann Weaver‐lariscy•Political Communication•1995

  • Trend analysis of the 1984 GOP senatorial spots

    J Gregory Payne, Robert A Baukus•Political Communication•1988

  • Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior

    Richard R Lau•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience

    Craig Leonard Brians, Martin P Wattenberg et al.•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Television Advertising in Election Campaigns

    Open Access•Darrell M West•Political Science Quarterly•1994

  • The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements

    Open Access•Richard R Lau, Lee Sigelman et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • The Impact of Campaign Spot Advertising on Voting Defections

    Open Access•Richard A Joslyn•Human Communication Research•1981

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,27
Citation span2004 - 2024 (21)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae