Women domination in the Galombang dance
Between the Customary Idealism and the Market Use
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7520643 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Indrayuda (0000-0001-5109-8202, State University of Padang, corresponding author), Indrayuda Indrayuda, Ardipal (0009-0004-9153-6907, State University of Padang), Ardipal Ardipal |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 153-153 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Harmonia Journal of Arts Research and Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1411-5115 • E-ISSN: 2541-2426 |
| Publisher | State University of Semarang (PUBLISHER • ID) |
| DOI | 10.15294/harmonia.v17i2.10724 |
| OpenAlex | W2782408064 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
This study aims to answer the women dominance in the Galombang dance creation in Minangkabau, West Sumatra from gender perspective. In addition, this study also reveals the position of women as an urgent thing in the Minangkabau dance creations, Galombang. This research used interdisciplinary approach, namely Cultural Sociology and Dance Anthropology. The data were obtained through various interviews, direct monitoring in the situation of the Galombang dance activity, and literature study to support the primary data. The analysis was done through ethnography method. The result of the research found that women dominance was bigger than men in the Galombang dance creations. In customary idealism, women are not Galombang dancers as the Galombang dance is intended for men. In reality, there is a bigger role between men and women in the Galombang dance; therefore, men’s role is not very decisive on the performance quality and selling value, as well as for the use of dance Galombang creations by society nowadays in West Sumatra
Aesthetics · Art · Dance · Dominance (genetics · Epistemology · Ethnography · Idealism · Perspective (graphical · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Visual arts · Anthropology · Child Development and Education · Cultural and Artistic Studies · Gender Studies · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |