Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Are there dominant response tendencies for social reactions? Trust trumps mistrust—evidence from a Dominant Behavior Measure (DBM)

Bibliographic Data

ID7539628
AuthorsMaayan Katzir (0000-0002-0498-9093, Bar-Ilan University), Ann-Christin Posten (0000-0003-0297-4274, University of Limerick)
Year2023
Volume125
Issue1
Pages57-81
Publication date2023-01-12
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/pspa0000334
PMID36633993
OpenAlexW4315705383
LanguageEN
Citations received4

The question of whether individuals are more prone to trust or to mistrust has increasingly interested economists and psychologists in recent years. To investigate whether people have an initial response tendency to trust versus mistrust, we developed a novel paradigm-the Dominant Behavior Measure (DBM). Capitalizing on decades of meticulous research in basic cognitive psychology (i.e., bilingual studies, Stroop paradigm), we designed a task to measure the dominance of reactions in the social realm. Participants engaged in a series of trust games that involved switching between trusting and mistrusting two trustworthy counterparts and two untrustworthy counterparts, identified by color (while ignoring a distractor name) or by name (when no color was presented). Like other dominant response tendencies (e.g., participant's first language), trust is faster, harder to switch to, and more interfering/facilitating than mistrust (Experiments 1-7). The dominance of trust holds in various social contexts-certainty of counterpart's un/trustworthiness (Experiments 4a-4c), unfamiliar counterparts (Experiments 5 and 6), counterparts from one's in-group versus out-group (Experiment 6), and negative framing of trust (Experiment 7)-showing that the dominant tendency to trust people (but not nonsocial objects, Experiment 8) is context-independent and robust. We rule out alternative explanations such as asymmetric payoff (Experiments 2 and 4b), familiarity and strength of association (Experiments 5 and 6), demand characteristics (Experiment 7), and positivity bias (Experiment 8). Introducing the DBM as a novel paradigm, we show that trust dominates mistrust and discuss the potential of this paradigm to determine dominant responses in manifold social domains. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved

Certainty · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Dictator game · Epistemology · Framing (construction · Stroop effect · Trustworthiness · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Switch cost in arithmetic operations and its relation to math anxiety

    Open Access•Yarden Gliksman, Shir Levy•Psychological Research•2025

  • You Are Not Alone – Third-Party Punishment by Individuals and Groups Empowers Victims

    Open Access•Stefanie Hechler, Ann-Christin Posten•Personality and Social Psychology…•2026

  • Face–context integration and trustworthiness evaluation

    Maria Brambilla, Simone Mattavelli et al.•European Review of Social…•2024

  • Letters of recommendation as institutionalized gossip

    Open Access•Britt Hadar, Nir Halevy•Journal of Experimental Social…•2024

Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae