Some Notes on Party Membership in Congress, I

Bibliographic Data

ID7591843
AuthorsClarence A Berdahl (University of Illinois System, corresponding author)
Year1949
Volume43
Issue2
Pages309-321
Publication date1949-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1950384
OpenAlexW2153396545
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited1

The general problem of party membership in the United States was examined to some extent in an earlier article in this Review, and out of that study certain implications could be noted with respect to the nature and operation of our two-party system. It was assumed, to begin with, that it is important in any party system “to bring together those persons, and only those persons, who adhere to the respective party principles,” and particularly important to do that in a two-party system, “where the principles and issues are presumably sharply denned and clearly distinguishable.” The extended survey of the trends in legislation and in party practice led to the conclusion that there is still need for “some better definition or understanding of what is meant by a loyal Republican and a loyal Democrat,” that the lack of such definition is at least partially responsible for the loose and irresponsible nature of the party organizations, for the mass of glittering generalities in party platforms, and for the failure to offer the voter anything like clear alternative programs. “Somehow or other, it should be possible to have a party system which would make it clear whether Wendell Willkie or Senator Nye is the better Republican, whether Franklin D. Roosevelt or Senator Wheeler is the better Democrat

Democracy · Duverger's law · Law and economics · Legislation · Party platform · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Split-ticket voting · Voting · Whip (tree · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub