Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

National campaign effects on secondary pupils' bullying and violence

Bibliographic Data

ID7675835
AuthorsTon Mooij, John Lanchester (corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume75
Issue3
Pages489-511
Publication date2005-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1348/000709904x23727
PMID16238878
OpenAlexW16238878
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited21

Background. Research on pupils' bullying (1991) and violence (1993) motivated the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science to initiate a national campaign on school safety. The government campaign was undertaken from 1995 to 2000. Aim. To test for differences in secondary pupils' bullying and violence before and after the campaign while controlling for different contextual variables. Samples. In 1991, a representative survey on bullying was conducted in 36 secondary schools with 1,055 pupils from Year 2 and 4 classes (age range 13–16 years). In 1993, a survey on violent behaviour took place in 71 secondary schools with 1,998 pupils from Year 3 and 4 classes (age range 14–16 years). In 2000, a survey on bullying and violence was conducted in 60 secondary schools with 9,948 pupils from Year 1 to 6 classes (age range 12–18 years). Methods. The data from pupils in identical school years were compared with respect to bullying (1991–2000) and violence (1993–2000). The statistical relations were analysed in two stepwise multiple regression analyses. Year of investigation (1991–2000, 1993–2000) was the respective dependent variable. The independent variables were pupils' bullying or violence scores, sex, school year, contextual lesson, school, and community variables. Results. In both regression analyses, the contextual lesson and school variables discriminated between the measurement years. Also, compared with 1991, the pupils in 2000 scored lower for being a bully and higher for being bullied directly. Compared with 1993, the pupils in 2000 scored lower for being a victim of intentional damage to property or emotional violence, lower for being a perpetrator of disruptive behaviour in school, and higher for being a perpetrator of intentional damage to property. Conclusions. The differences between the contextual variables measured before and after the campaign reflect changes in educational and instructional situations. Independent of these differences, the national campaign appears to have helped improve the awareness of pupils' social behaviour and elicit, in particular, a decrease in pupils' violent behaviour. However, more specific pedagogical and preventative support for pupils socially at risk appears to be needed to have a more prosocial impact on the behaviour of secondary school pupils

Economics · Economy · Political science · Global Financial Crisis and Policies

  • Update on bullying at school

    Open Access•Kathleen Stassen Berger•Developmental Review•2007

  • Differences in pupil characteristics and motives in being a victim, perpetrator and witness of violence in secondary education

    T Mooij•Research Papers in Education•2011

  • Multi‐level aspects of social cohesion of secondary schools and pupils' feelings of safety

    Open Access•T Mooij, Ed Smeets et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2011

  • School Bullying

    Sonia Sharp, P K Smith et al.•School Bullying•2002

  • School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims

    Anthony D Pellegrini, Maria Bartini et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•1999

  • A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school

    Open Access•Anthony D Pellegrini, Jeffrey D Long•British Journal of Developmental…•2002

  • Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior

    Terrie E Moffitt•Psychological Review•1993

  • Social competence

    Open Access•C Cybele Raver, Edward Zigler et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•1997

  • Understanding and Preventing Bullying

    David P Farrington•Crime and Justice•1993

  • Problems with the Paradigm

    Shigemi Yoneyama, Shoko Yoneyama et al.•British Journal of Sociology of…•2003

  • Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany

    Open Access•Dieter Wolke, Sarah Wood et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2001

  • Victimization in the school and the workplace

    Open Access•P K Smith, Monika Singer et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2003

  • Promoting prosocial pupil behaviour

    Open Access•T Mooij•British Journal of Educational…•1999

  • Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour

    Open Access•Amy Kaplan, Avi Kaplan et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2002

  • Promoting prosocial pupil behaviour

    Open Access•T Mooij•British Journal of Educational…•1999

  • Knowledge and attitudes about school bullying in trainee teachers

    Open Access•Sonia Nicolaide, Sonia Nicolaides et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2002

  • Bullying in Flemish schools

    Open Access•Veerle Stevens, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2000

Citations per year0.16
Citation span2007 - 2011 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae