A Note on Reece's Proportional-Loss Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7677217 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brian Moore (0000-0001-8377-8579), Brian Moores (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 379-384 |
| Publication date | 1987-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1234 • E-ISSN: 1469-2112 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007123400004816 |
| OpenAlex | W1970314867 |
| Language | EN |
In a recent publication Reece proposes to substitute for the ‘swing’ method what he labels a proportional-loss model. Although his argument against the logic of the swing method is perfectly valid, this short Note will demonstrate that what he offers as a substitute is just as unsound intellectually
Argument (complex analysis · Calculus (dental · Econometrics · Economics · Mathematical economics · Swing · Applied Mathematics · Chemistry · Computer Science · Engineering · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Mathematics · Mechanical Engineering · Medicine
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |