Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tool Standardization in the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic

A Closer Look (with comments)

Bibliographic Data

ID7700515
AuthorsAnthony E Marks (0000-0003-0195-0203, Southern Methodist University, corresponding author), Anthony Marks (0000-0001-6349-8465), Harold J Hietala (Southern Methodist University), John K Williams (0009-0008-5517-1591, Southern Methodist University)
Year2001
Volume11
Issue1
Pages17-44
Publication date2001-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCambridge Archaeological Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-7743 • E-ISSN: 1474-0540
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0959774301000026
OpenAlexW2089152800
LanguageEN
Citations received33

It has been postulated that one difference between Neanderthals and anatomically modern people lies in a ‘clearer mental template’ of flaked stone tools on the part of modern people. This is thought to have been manifested in greater tool standardization during the Upper Palaeolithic than in the Middle Palaeolithic. Testing of this hypothesis, using three samples of a characteristic Upper Palaeolithic tool class — burins — from one Middle Palaeolithic and two Upper Palaeolithic assemblages, reveals that they are equally standardized for both metric and non-metric traits. Further consideration suggests that most Palaeolithic flaked stone tools are poorly suited to test notions of standardization, although some tool attributes may be well suited when considered in specific adaptive contexts

Archaeology · Geography · Metric (unit · Standardization · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Computer Science · Engineering · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · History · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

  • Questioning the Link Between Stone Tool Standardization and Behavioral Modernity

    G Monnier, Gilliane F Monnier et al.•New perspectives on old stones•2010

  • Threading the Weft, Testing the Warp

    Open Access•Nick Reynolds, Natasha Reynolds•2020

  • Projectiles and Hafting Technology

    Open Access•Veerle Rots•Multidisciplinary Approaches to…•2016

  • Middle Palaeolithic Scraper Morphology, Flaking Mechanics and Imposed Form

    Open Access•G Monnier, Gilliane F Monnier•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2007

  • Keeping your Edge

    Ben Marwick, Benjamin Marwick et al.•Keeping your edge•2011

  • Filling in the Blanks

    Antoine Muller, C Clarkson•Lithic Technology•2022

  • The Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition and the diversification of Levallois technology in the Southern Levant

    Open Access•R Shimelmitz, Mina Weinstein-Evron et al.•Quaternary International•2016

  • Application of a new typological approach to classifying denticulate and notched tools

    Open Access•Andrea Picin, M Peresani et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2010

  • A Segment is not a Monolith

    Open Access•L Wadley, Moleboheng Mohapi•Journal of Archaeological Science•2008

  • The Middle Palaeolithic in China a review of current interpretations

    Open Access•Yee Mei Kei•Antiquity•2012

  • Investigating standardisation in the form of backed artefacts at two sites in the Hunter River valley, NSW, Australia

    Marika Low, Marika A Low•Australian Archaeology•2015

  • A composite model of scraper variation

    Trudy Doelman, Grant W G Cochrane et al.•Australian Archaeology•2015

  • Early Old World migrations of Homo sapiens

    Open Access•Peter Hiscock•The Encyclopedia of Global Human…•2013

  • Standardization of Nubian Levallois Technology in Dhofar, Southern Arabia

    Open Access•H S Groucutt, Jeffrey I Rose•Lithic Technology•2023

  • Morphometric Characterization of Denticulate Edged Tools from the Northern Coast of the Santa Cruz Province, Argentine Patagonia

    Pablo Ambrústolo•Lithic Technology•2023

  • Variable Perspectives on “ Standardization in the Stone Age ”

    J Pargeter, H S Groucutt•Lithic Technology•2023

  • Functional Perspectives on Lithic Standardization

    Noora Taipale, Veerle Rots•Lithic Technology•2023

  • Optional and inconvenient additions

    Open Access•Andrzej Wiśniewski, Adam Kobyłka et al.•Sprawozdania Archeologiczne•2025

  • Geometric Morphometric Analyses of Levallois Points from the Levantine Middle Paleolithic do not Support Functional Specialization

    Briggs Buchanan, M J Hamilton et al.•Lithic Technology•2023

  • Late Pleistocene Archaeological and Fossil Human Evidence from Lakonis Cave, Southern Greece

    Eleni Panagopoulou, Panagiotis Karkanas et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2004

  • A chronicle of crisis

    Open Access•Javier Baena Preysler, Javier Baena et al.•Quaternary International•2011

  • Skill and Core Uniformity

    E P Wilson, Dietrich Stout et al.•Lithic Technology•2023

  • An analysis of the compositional integrity of the Levantine Mousterian facies

    Open Access•Elisabeth V Culley, Elisabeth Culley et al.•Quaternary International•2012

  • Bagratashen 1, a stratified open-air Middle Paleolithic site in the Debed river valley of northeastern Armenia

    Open Access•Charles P Egeland, Boris Gasparian et al.•Archaeological Research in Asia•2016

  • Lithic Standardization and Behavioral Complexity in the Middle Stone Age – A Case Study From Sibhudu, South Africa

    Matthias A Blessing, N J Conard et al.•Lithic Technology•2022

  • Learner-driven innovation in the stone tool technology of earlyHomo sapiens

    Open Access•J Wilkins•Evolutionary Human Sciences•2020

  • Psychological components of middle paleolithic technology

    Open Access•T Alexandra Sumner, Tom Sumner•Journal of Anthropological…•2011

  • Late Pleistocene Technology, Economic Behavior, and Land-Use Dynamics in Southern Italy

    Open Access•J Riel-Salvatore, C Michael Barton•American Antiquity•2004

  • Hammer or crescent wrench? Stone-tool form and function in the Aurignacian of southwest Germany

    Open Access•Bruce L Hardy, Bruce Hardy et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2008

  • Success of a flexible behavior. Considerations on the manufacture of Late Epigravettian lithic projectile implements according to experimental tests

    Open Access•R Duches, M Peresani et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2018

  • Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician points were used primarily as hunting weapons

    Open Access•Andrzej Wiśniewski, Katarzyna Pyżewicz et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2022

  • Neandertal Archaeology-Implications for Our Origins

    Open Access•Geoffrey A Clark•American Anthropologist•2002

  • The Upper Paleolithic Revolution

    Ofer Bar‐yosef, Ofer Bar-Yosef•Annual Review of Anthropology•2002

Unique citing works33
Citations per year1,38
Citation span2002 - 2025 (24)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 33

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae