A Curious Trade
The Recovery and Repatriation of U.S. Missing In Action from the Vietnam War
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7730675 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Wagner (0000-0003-2659-900X, George Washington University, corresponding author), Sarah E Wagner |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 161-190 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Studies in Society and History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-4175 • E-ISSN: 1475-2999 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0010417514000632 |
| OpenAlex | W2045840447 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 55 |
Amid its human and material tolls, the Vietnam War has given rise to a curious enterprise—the complex process of recovering and repatriating the remains of U.S. service members Missing In Action (MIA) and presumed dead. In this trade, the bones that “count” are American and the aims underwriting the forensic efforts to return them are rooted in an ideology of national belonging.The resultant exchange of both knowledge and physical remains has developed through two historically intertwined ventures: state-sponsored casualty resolution efforts; and the much smaller, informal trafficking of skeletal remains, identification media, and information about American MIAs. This article examines how these sought-after bones tack between roles as objects of recovery, sale, or barter, scientific study, ritual burial, and public commemoration. Through their mutable worth, MIA remains illustrate the dynamic symbolism of war dead that evokes differing sensibilities about familiar or foreign soil, about care and belonging. Like the reliquiae of medieval Christianity, remains of missing service members, even in the most fragmentary form, are replete with the suggestion of power. Their pursuit depends on reciprocity. Indeed, more than just powerful symbols, these bones manifest and confer power itself, as caring for war dead demonstrates authority, and such authority falls to those who control access to the desired object, whether through formal or informal channels. Furthermore, power requires authentication, and the remains of missing American war dead become, in this system of circulation and exchange, a means to demonstrate knowledge, perform certainty, or exploit ambiguity
Political science · Power (physics) · Repatriation · Sociology · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
The Last Commodity
Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning
Forensic Taphonomy
The cultural biography of things
The bell curve
The political lives of dead bodies
The Social Life of Things
Global Assemblages
Introduction
After the MassacreCommemoration and Consolation in Ha My and My Lai
Fallen Soldiers
Bodies of Evidence
The American War in Contemporary Vietnam
Four Decades On
To Know Where He Lies
The Vietnam War and American Culture
Country of Memory
Tangled Memories
““Sacrilege of a Strange, Contemporary Kind””
Remembering War the American Way
The Gift
Improvisational economies
Filling in the Blanks
Exhibiting War, Reconciling Pasts
Orderly Departure from Vietnam
The making and unmaking of an unknown soldier
Honoring the Civil War Dead
Soldier Dead
Holy Bones, Holy Dust
From John McCain to Abu Ghraib
Armed with Abundance
On the Battlefield of Memory
Vietnamese Casualties During the American War
The Wall, the Screen, and the Image
Commodity Fetishism in Organs Trafficking
The Country of Memory
Purity and Exile
Ghosts of War in Vietnam
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Nuclear Rites
Vietnam Zippos
What the Fuck is a Vietnam
Exhuming the defeated
Memorials of the America War in Vietnam
Empire through Diasporic Eyes
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,9 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |