Give us the numbers
Sovereign capture and the undermining of shared situational awareness in the UK’s Covid-19 response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7737513 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chris Zebrowski (0000-0003-0109-729X, Loughborough University, corresponding author), Daniel Sage (0000-0003-0797-3879, Loughborough University), Nina Jörden (0000-0002-0139-4641, University of Cambridge) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-37 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Studies on Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2162-4887 • E-ISSN: 2162-4909 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21624887.2024.2417483 |
| OpenAlex | W4403540589 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 31 |
Shared situational awareness is advanced as a solution to the problem of collaborative decision-making in multi-agency emergency responses. By harnessing information and communication technologies to construct and distribute a common understanding of the event, shared situational awareness promises to optimise, distribute and devolve decision-making, thus improving the overall speed and efficiency of emergency responses. However, in the context of actual emergencies shared situational awareness is found to routinely breakdown. This paper draws upon 41 interviews conducted with emergency responders on their experience of using ResilienceDirect to manage shared situational awareness in the UK Covid-19 response. We argue that while shared situational awareness attempts to technologise the problem of sovereign decision-making in emergencies, UK emergency response frameworks contain a latent potential for sovereign capture. As the Covid-19 response demonstrates, an atmosphere of distrust; desire for secrecy and control; and the ubiquity of hierarchies throughout UK Civil Contingencies permitted the reactualisation of sovereign modes of control to frustrate and displace bottom-up modes of emergency organisation meant to guide UK emergency responses. Elucidating the impediments to achieving shared situational awareness within actual response raises urgent questions regarding the robustness of shared situational awareness to political interference within major emergency events
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Computer security · Pandemic · Political science · Situation awareness · Situational ethics · Sovereignty · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Engineering · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Virology
The Liberal Way of War
The Everyday Resilience of the City
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Designerly ways of knowing
Covid-19 pandemic
The State of Exception
Political Theology
Homo Sacer
Acting local, thinking global
Situational awareness’
Emergent emergency response
Governing emergencies
Designing affect into security
A thousand plateaus
Crisis Management in Hindsight
Design-driven resilience and the limits of geographic critique
Event and Anticipation
Desert Storm and Deterrence
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |