Grace and correspondence in ethnography and psychotherapy

Bibliographic Data

ID7769170
AuthorsInga‐britt Krause (0000-0002-4086-4837, Department of Education and Training, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume53
Issue3
Publication date2025-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0091-2131 • E-ISSN: 1548-1352
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/etho.70003
OpenAlexW4408419010
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

For all the ways in which anthropologists have addressed relations during the history of the discipline, from kinship to the contemporary focus on comparison, it is surprising that anthropologists rarely write about the pragmatics of the messy dynamics of relating between interlocutors themselves and between interlocutors and ethnographers. This is despite some anthropologists having highlighted the work of these relations and our approach to them as crucial for the discipline. In this paper I argue that the inquiry practiced in one particular psychotherapeutic approach, namely systemic psychotherapy, is relevant to this micro practice of anthropology. I will present a transcription of a piece of systemic psychotherapeutic work. I will make three points, inspired by work in systemic psychotherapy as well as anthropology. My first point concerns plurality, my second point refers to second‐order observation or the use of reflexivity, and my third to the temporal dimension of the inquiry as a process. I suggest that considering these three points will enhance methods of inquiry in both disciplines

Ethnography · Psychoanalysis · Psychotherapist · Sociology · Anthropology · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Psychology · Social Representations and Identity

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access