Which Subject Lines and Messages Improve Response to E-mail Invitations to Web Surveys
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7774122 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip S Brenner (0000-0002-8848-1114, University of Massachusetts Boston, corresponding author), Carol Cosenza (0000-0003-2948-024X, University of Massachusetts Boston), Floyd Jackson Fowler (0000-0001-5889-6362, University of Massachusetts Boston) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 365-382 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | CAM (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1525822x20929647 |
| OpenAlex | W3036127193 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 16 |
What subject lines and messages in an e-mailed invitation maximize cooperation for a web survey? Answering this question is ever more important as survey researchers increasingly turn to web surveys to reduce costs. We test respondents’ preferences for subject lines and messages in an e-mailed invitation to participate in a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. Findings suggest that respondents prefer informative and straightforward subject lines that reference the purpose and the sponsor of the survey. Brief and uninformative subject lines should be avoided. In the body of the e-mail, respondents prefer messages that expand on the study’s purpose and usefulness and extend a guarantee of confidentiality. Messages that encourage participation for the sake of the study’s representativeness or accuracy are unpersuasive to potential respondents. Few differences emerged in preferences among demographic subgroups
Computer security · Confidentiality · Internet privacy · Representativeness heuristic · Subject (documents) · Test (biology) · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Estrategias para mejorar la respuesta de las encuestas en línea
Testing Motivation-Based vs. Social Exchange Communication Strategies in Email Survey Recruitment
An Experimental Study on the Impact of Contact Design on Web Survey Participation
Does a short-term deadline extension affect participation rates of an online survey? Experimental evidence from an online panel
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey
Email subject lines and response rates to invitations to participate in a web survey and a face-to-face interview
Sponsor Prominence and Responses Patterns to an Online Survey
Confidentiality Assurances in Surveys
E-mail Subject Lines and Their Effect on Web Survey Viewing and Response
How You Ask Counts
The Effect of Invitation Design on Web Survey Response Rates
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys
Can Phishing Tank Survey Response Rates? Evidence from a Natural Experiment
The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates
Web Surveys
Survey Breakoff
| Citations per year | 0.8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |