Russian hybrid warfare and extended deterrence in eastern Europe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7805082 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexander Lanoszka (0000-0001-6812-3873, Postdoctoral fellow at the Dickey Center for International Understanding at Dartmouth College., corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 175-195 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2346.12509 |
| OpenAlex | W2229978272 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 58 |
| References cited | 4 |
Russia's use of force against Ukraine since early 2014 has prompted some observers to remark that it is engaging in ‘hybrid warfare’. This form of military statecraft has made other former Soviet republics, such as the Baltic countries, fear that Russia would use subversion rather than pursue a conventional military engagement against them. Despite this concern about Russian hybrid war, existing descriptions of this form of war suffer from conceptual weaknesses. In this article hybrid warfare is conceived as a strategy that marries conventional deterrence and insurgency tactics. That is, the belligerent uses insurgent tactics against its target while using its conventional military power to deter a strong military response. The article then outlines why some former Soviet republics are susceptible to Russian hybrid warfare, allowing it to postulate inductively the conditions under which hybrid warfare might be used in general. The analysis yields two policy implications. First, military solutions are not wholly appropriate against hybrid warfare since it exploits latent ethnic grievances and weak civil societies. Second, only under narrow circumstances would belligerents resort to hybrid warfare. Belligerents need to be revisionist and militarily stronger than their targets, but they also need to have ethnic or linguistic ties with the target society to leverage in waging hybrid warfare
Belligerent · Deterrence theory · Insurgency · Military strategy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Subversion · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Military Strategy and Technology · Nuclear Issues and Defense
Russian scholarly discussions of nonmilitary warfare as securitizing acts
Coercive diplomacy and the Donbas
Opposition as “A Mould on the Fatherland
People in the Face of Modern Warfare
Understanding susceptibility to Russian propaganda
Priming the Costs of Conflict? Russian Public Opinion About the 2014 Crimean Conflict
Out of the Shadows
Transnational Authoritarianism
Identity, stability, Hybrid Threats and Disinformation
Measuring the scope of pro-Kremlin disinformation on Twitter
Projecting ‘Hybrid Warfare’
Overcoming Anglocentrism in covert action scholarship
Not quite “the same enemies and the same friends”
Grey matters
Unique risks and evolving trends in Arctic governance
Disinformation in international politics
Beyond tit-for-tat in cyberspace
Russia’s rising military and communication power
Remote warfare – Buzzword or Buzzkill
Thank goodness for Nato enlargement
Nato’s sub-conventional deterrence
Levels of division
Global Britain in the grey zone
Nuclear weapons and alliance institutions in the era of President Trump
Reimagining Nato after Crimea
Divergent Frontiers
Useful, but Not Necessarily Idiots
Russia's Fifth Column
Understanding hybrid warfare
Towards a typology of non-state actors in ‘hybrid warfare’
Perceptions of hybrid war in Russia
Introduction ‘hybrid warfare in Asia
Deter together or deter separately
Speaking of hybrid warfare
Power of Standards
Toward a Strategic Art for Sanctions
Balancing Priorities in America's European Strategy
Parameters Summer 2021
Greater Security Cooperation
Intelligence Services and Special Operations Forces
Pro)-Russian (dis)information in Moldova
Hybrid minilateralism
Framing and counter-framing a Peace March in Russia
When Capabilities Backfire
Fighting Propaganda with Censorship
From Moscow with coercion
Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures
Hybrid warfare’ as an academic fashion
Building Resilience Against Hostile Information Influence Activities
Uncertainty in crisis bargaining with multiple policy options
The Multidimensional Soft Power of Illiberal States
Victims of Democracy” or “Enemies at the Gates”? Russian Discourses on the European “Refugee Crisis”
Fellow travelers or Trojan horses? Similarities across pro-Russian parties’ electorates in Europe
The Shadow of Deterrence
Struggles for Recognition
Fronteras ocultas en la zona gris europea
Russia’s Night Wolves, Migrating Memory and Europe’s Eastern Frontier
Doxing democracy
| Unique citing works | 58 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,8 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 55 |