Natural history museums as provocateurs for dialogue and debate
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7928372 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Carnall (University College London), Jack Ashby (0000-0002-6390-255X, University College London, corresponding author), Claire Ro (0000-0001-6952-6308, University College London), Claire Ross |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 55-71 |
| Publication date | 2013-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Museum Management and Curatorship (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0964-7775 • E-ISSN: 1872-9185 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09647775.2012.754630 |
| OpenAlex | W2093894164 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 6 |
Interpretation in natural history museums is generally conservative with methods of collections interpretation barely changed since the first natural history museums were founded. For all the changes undertaken by museums in the last 20 years, sector leaders such as the American Museum of Natural History, the Natural History Museum, London, the National Museum, Prague, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin and the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris still operate by connecting objects with facts about their biology. The recent relocation of the Grant Museum of Zoology at University College London has offered the opportunity for the museum to become a space for dialogue and experimentation. The museum, in collaboration with the university, has developed ‘social interpretation’ designed to engage visitors with controversial questions in life sciences and museum practice. Visitor responses are recorded and used as the basis to plan future work. The paper explores how this form of engagement with visitors might allow natural history museums to add to established methods of interpretation, and – in a form of co-production with their visitors – challenge attitudes to scientific knowledge and its development. Thus, the way natural history museums function as sources of knowledge for the public and the ‘front line’ of biological engagement is potentially changed, based on the responses of museum visitors
Archaeology · Art · Biology · Museum informatics · National Museum of Natural History · Natural history · Sociology · Visitor pattern · Visual arts · Animal and Plant Science Education · Computer Science · History · Museology · Museums and Cultural Heritage · Species Distribution and Climate Change · Ecology
The Lost Port Landscape of Medieval Bruges Reconstructed in Virtual Reality
Curating the In-Between
Java Man and the Politics of Natural History
Gender Differences in AI-Powered Virtual Museum Guides
Portugal in the European Network of Marine Science Heritage and Outreach (19th–20th Centuries)
The Enchantment of the Archaeological Record
Digital innovation and social relevance in European art museums and galleries
Museum-audience interaction within permanent exhibitions of natural history museums
Choice, Negotiation, and Pluralism
Nine meta-functions for science museums and science centres
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,11 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |