Criteria of Periodization in the History of European Art
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7932146 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meyer Schapiro, H W Janson, E H Gombrich |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 113 |
| Publication date | 1970-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Literary History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/468623 |
| OpenAlex | W2324788899 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
1. Apart from mathematical divisions (centuries, millenniums) and the prehistoric tool and site names with their numbered stages, period names have been of three kinds: political-dynastic, cultural, and aesthetic. Examples of the first are Carolingian, Ottonian, Tudor; of the second, Mediaeval, Renaissance; of the third, Romanesque, Classic, Mannerist, Baroque. Each type of name originally implied a theory about the art it designated. The aesthetic names are more common, but the others survive, often with changed sense. We no longer accept the original meanings of Romanesque and Gothic, but we continue to use these period names as conventions with new historical boundaries
Ancient history · Periodization · Architecture and Art History Studies · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · History
L’historiographie de l’architecture du XIXe siècle
Visual Studies and the Iconic Turn
Ralph Cohen on Literary Periods
On the Presuppositions of Literary Periods
Mimesis and Iconoclasm
Collectors and Collections
Kritios and Nesiotes as Revolutionary Artists? Ancient and Archaeological Perspectives on the So-Called Severe Style Period
George Kubler and serial appreciation
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2024 (17) |
| Highly cited | No |