Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The phoenix of bipolarity

Reply to Watson and Tellegen (1999)

Bibliographic Data

ID7983202
AuthorsJames A Russell (0000-0003-1041-3717, University of British Columbia), James Carroll (0000-0002-7602-5285), James M Carroll (0000-0002-3061-0761)
Year1999
Volume125
Issue5
Pages611-617
Publication date1999-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.611
OpenAlexW1973670648
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited25

(1999) agreed that when various factors, including activation, are taken into account, the structure of self-reported affect includes a bipolar dimension contrasting pleasant with unpleasant feelings. Agree-ment on this the central conclusion of our review may surprise readers familiar with the widespread claim that pleasant and unpleasant affect are not bipolar opposites but are largely independent of one another. Pleasant and unpleasant, relaxed and tense, elated and de-pressed—such pairs seem bipolar. But appearances can be decep-tive, and psychometric evidence has challenged their bipolarity, raising fundamental questions that have vexed the psychology of affect for over 40 years now. These questions arise in basic research (how should affect be conceptualized and assessed?) and in applied contexts (are the debilitating effects of negative affect counteracted by, or independent of, increases in positive affect?). Over the past dozen years, the bipolar view of affect has appeared to be on its deathbed. The question of bipolarity recently returned to center stage in the psychology of affect (Cacioppo

Archaeology · Phoenix · Watson · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Emotions and Moral Behavior · History · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology

  • Negative Affects Deriving From the Behavioral Approach System

    Charles S Carver•Emotion•2004

  • An Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making in Complex Situations

    Open Access•Alice M Isen•Journal of Consumer Psychology•2001

  • Anger is an approach-related affect

    Charles S Carver, Eddie Harmon-Jones•Psychological Bulletin•2009

  • When nonsense sounds happy or helpless

    Markus Quirin, Miguel Kazén et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • Meaning-focused coping, pain, and affect

    Open Access•Ewa Gruszczyńska, Nina Knoll•Quality of Life Research•2015

  • Assessing Mood in Daily Life

    Peter Wilhelm, Dominik Schoebi•European Journal of Psychological…•2007

  • Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction

    Timothy A Judge, Daniel Heller et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2002

  • Ineffectiveness of Reverse Wording of Questionnaire Items

    Open Access•Eric Van Sonderen, R Sanderman et al.•PLoS ONE•2013

  • The recovery effects of binge-watching on next-day performance through recovery experiences, vigor, and affective rumination

    Open Access•Ying-Syuan Cian, Nai‐wen Chi et al.•Current Psychology•2026

  • Is Rebt Useful for Reducing Adolescents’ Career Decision Difficulties and Distress? A Randomized Trial

    Open Access•Viktória Kulcsár, Anca Dobrean et al.•Journal of Career Development•2024

  • Recovery from work by playing video games

    Open Access•Ömer Erdem Koçak, Marjan J Gorgievski et al.•Applied Psychology•2024

  • Evaluating the status of theories of emotion in political science and psychology

    Open Access•George E Marcus•Frontiers in Political Science•2023

  • Measurement of Dispositional Affect

    Open Access•Timothy J Huelsman, R Michael Furr et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2003

  • Exploring the influence of soundscape on visitors’ emotional experience and stickiness to attractions

    Irene Cheng Chu Chan, Zhaoyu Chen et al.•Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism…•2024

  • Affective Forecasting Errors in the 2008 Election

    Open Access•Catherine J Norris, Amanda G Dumville et al.•Political Psychology•2011

  • How Do Respondents Construe Ambiguous Response Formats of Affect Items

    Susana Lloret Segura, Vicente González-Romá•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • The structure of psychological well-being

    Norman M Bradburn•The structure of psychological…•1969

  • Reports on happiness

    Norman M Bradburn•Reports on happiness•1965

  • Measurement and Mismeasurement of Mood

    David Watson, Lesley A Clark et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•1997

  • On the Dimensional and Hierarchical Structure of Affect

    Open Access•Auke Tellegen, David Watson et al.•Psychological Science•1999

  • Testing Structural Equation Models

    J Scott Long, Kenneth A Bollen•Testing Structural Equation Models•2012

  • Trends and Perspectives in Empirical Social Research

    Ingwer Bork, Ingwer Borg et al.•Trends and Perspectives in…•1994

  • Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures

    Open Access•John T Cacioppo, Wendi L Gardner et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1997

  • Issues in dimensional structure of affect—Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats

    David Watson, Auke Tellegen•Psychological Bulletin•1999

  • Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space

    John T Cacioppo, Gary G Berntson•Psychological Bulletin•1994

  • The relationship between attitudes and beliefs

    Anthony J Smith, Russell D Clark•Journal of Personality and Social…•1973

  • Static, dynamic, and causative bipolarity of affect

    Donald P Green, Peter Salovey et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being

    Norbert Schwarz, Gerald L Clore•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Affective space is bipolar

    James A Russell•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Intensity and frequency

    Ed Diener, Randy J Larsen et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985

  • Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes

    Barbara L Fredrickson, Daniel Kahneman•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components

    John T Cacioppo, Wendi L Gardner et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • The structure of mood change

    Michael A Zevon, Auke Tellegen•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

  • Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect

    Lisa Feldman Barrett, James A Russell•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect

    David Watson•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • The relationship in experience between various types of affect

    Ed Diener, Asghar Iran-Nejad et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Structure of self-reported current affect

    Michelle S M Yik, James A Russell et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • The two general activation systems of affect

    David Watson, David Wiese et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • A circumplex model of affect

    James A Russell•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect

    James A Russell, James Carroll et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1999

  • Toward a consensual structure of mood

    David Watson, David C Watson et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1985

Unique citing works16
Citations per year0,64
Citation span2001 - 2026 (26)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae