Platformization of care in Europe
Comparative Analysis of Marketization Trends and Business Models
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7990914 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elifcan Çelebi (0000-0002-2243-6425, University College Dublin), Michael Kemmerling (0000-0002-5733-9414, University of Cologne) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 5-6 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-333X • E-ISSN: 1758-6720 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/ijssp-01-2025-0057 |
| OpenAlex | W4415951077 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 40 |
Purpose We investigate how digital care platforms contribute to the marketization of care across the European Union (EU) by analyzing their business models and national variations. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a dataset from the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) and extensive hand-coding, we identify 100 care platforms and examine their characteristics using a novel three-dimensional analytical framework: scope of commodification, platform governance and distribution of market risks. Findings Our findings show that while care platforms share features with other digital labor platforms, the intimate, relational and non-standardized nature of care work limits algorithmic control and commodification. Nonetheless, care platforms contribute to marketization by intermediating a wide range of services, including emerging categories like pet care and tutoring and relying predominantly on marketplace models that shift risk onto workers. Importantly, we uncover cross-national variation: the Nordic countries, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands host more regulated platform models with less reliance on market mechanisms, whereas Eastern Europe is dominated by marketplace models. These patterns align with broader care regime typologies and suggest that care platforms both adapt to and reshape national care markets. Originality/value Our study offers the first comparative empirical overview of care platform business models across the EU and highlights the need for more nuanced, context-sensitive research to understand their evolving role in care provision. This complements existing research on platform workers' experiences of precarity and informality by showing that these are linked to care platform business models. Our findings have implications for platform regulation, addressing issues of care provision and (informal) labor
The Political Economy of Household Services in Europe
The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy
Marketization of welfare services in Scandinavia
Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies
Governing invisibility in the platform economy
Assessing gender inequality in digital labour platforms in Europe
Informal employment on domestic care platforms
Platform adaptation to regulation
Individualising Risk
A taxonomy of business models of digital care platforms in Spain
Welfare State Policies and the Development of Care Arrangements
Trusted strangers
The discursive politics of marketization in home care policy implementation in Ireland
How culture influences the strengthening of market principles in conservative welfare states
A social reproduction analysis of digital care platform work
Comparing Care Regimes in Europe
From the Commodification to the Corporatization of Care
After the Male Breadwinner Model? Childcare Services and the Division of Labor in European Countries
Social Politics and the Commodification of Care
Continuity or change? Platforms and the hybridization of neoliberal institutional contexts
The marketisation of care
Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes
Not all that glitters is gold
European long‐term care marketisation
The Political Construction of Elder Care Markets
Contradictions of Capital and Care
Will there be a Nordic model in the platform economy? Evasive and integrative platform strategies in Denmark and Sweden
Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship
The Hassle of Housework
Family Values
Digital Labour Platforms in the Italian Domestic Sector
On-Demand and Marketplace Platforms
The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism
The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states
Care as a Good for Social Policy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |