Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A New Argument for Anti-Natalism

Bibliographic Data

ID8076242
AuthorsChristopher Belshaw (corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume31
Issue1
Pages117-127
Publication date2012-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSouth African Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0258-0136 • E-ISSN: 2073-4867
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02580136.2012.10751772
OpenAlexW1990208511
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited7

Consider the view that coming into existence is bad for us. Can we hold this and yet deny that ceasing to exist would be good for us? I argue that we can. First, many animals have lives such that they would be better off not existing. Second, if persons and babies are distinct things then the same is true of babies. Third, even if persons and babies are not distinct things – rather they are phases that human beings go through – still it is bad for babies that they come into existence. So it was bad for us to come into existence. But most of us now enjoy worthwhile lives. So it would be bad for us, now, to cease to exist

Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Sociology · Medicine · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · Philosophy

  • Should Anti-Natalists Strive to Improve the World?

    Open Access•Kirk Lougheed•Journal of Bioethical Inquiry•2026

  • A Sonogram of the Dark Side of the Dao

    Open Access•Robbert Zandbergen•Comparative Philosophy An…•2021

  • “Is Not Giving Birth a Virtue?” A Theological Critique of Antinatalism from the Perspective of Islamic Theology

    Open Access•Fikrullah Çakmak, Aynur Önal•Şırnak Üniversitesi İlahiyat…•2025

  • Should vegans have children? A response to Räsänen

    Open Access•Louis Austin-Eames•Metamedicine•2024

  • A Dilemma for Benatar’s Asymmetry Argument

    Open Access•Fumitake Yoshizawa•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2021

  • A thousand pleasures are not worth a single pain

    Open Access•Byron Simmons•European Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • The Paradox of Sentiocentric Antinatalism

    Open Access•Masahiro Morioka•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2025

  • Dark personality traits and anti-natalist beliefs

    Madeleine K Meehan, Virgil Zeigler-Hill et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2024

  • Is humanity’s survival really that important

    Richard B Gibson•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • Deference, development, and large language models

    Open Access•Tim Bayne•Mind & Language•2025

  • Does the Lack of Cosmic Meaning Make Our Lives Bad

    Open Access•Thaddeus Metz•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2022

  • Anti-Natalism and (The Right Kinds of) Environmental Attitudes

    Open Access•Connor Leak•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2024

  • Better Never to Have Been, Better to Cease to Be

    Open Access•C J Leak, Connor Leak•Utilitas•2026

  • Deontology and safe artificial intelligence

    Open Access•William D’alessandro•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Ethics and Animals

    Open Access•Lori Gruen•Ethics and Animals•2011

  • The Animals Issue

    Open Access•Peter Carruthers•Animals Issue•1992

  • Was I Ever a Fetus

    Eric T Olson•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997

Unique citing works14
Citations per year2,8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae