Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kant's Theory of Mind

An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason

Bibliographic Data

ID8082264
AuthorsKarl Ameriks (University of Notre Dame, Indiana, corresponding author)
Year2000
Pages348
Publication date2000-03-23
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueKant's theory of mind (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/0198238975.001.0001
OpenAlexW4244709266
Open LibraryOL6896281M
ISBN9780198238973
LanguageEN
Citations received54

This book presents the first extensive analysis in English of Kant's systematic criticism of dogmatic accounts of the mind as a distinctive object. This criticism has been much admired, especially in Anglophone circles, but interpreters have rarely paid attention to its full historical context and the many different dimensions of its treatment of the mind. In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant organizes his criticism in terms of four fundamental fallacies or ‘paralogisms’ of ‘rational psychology’, and he discusses these under the heading of four traditional topics: substantiality, simplicity, identity, and ideality of the soul. A close analysis of Kant's earlier work, including notes from his lectures on metaphysics (most of which have been only recently published in German), demonstrates that Kant's most fundamental views here concern several topics that are not listed as one of the four explicit paralogism headings. In particular, his views on causality, judgement, and the mind's immateriality, independence (freedom), and immortality have a hidden and central importance. Throughout his career, Kant's views evolved on these topics, especially in the period of the extensive revisions of the paralogisms for the second ed. of the first Critique, when Kant published his major works on ethics, the Groundwork and the second Critique. In this period, he also developed his most sophisticated discussions of apperception and transcendental idealism. The volume outlines and evaluates the history and structure of each of Kant's major arguments in this area, and it comments on their relation to major lines of interpretation and developments in contemporary philosophy. It concludes that Kant's ultimate position on most doctrines concerning the mind is much closer to rationalism than is generally appreciated, and that this position also maintains, for the most part, a revolutionary critical perspective that remains highly relevant for current discussions

Apperception · Context (archaeology · Criticism · Epistemology · Idealism · Interpretation (philosophy · Literature · Metaphysics · Relation (database · Transcendental idealism · Transcendental number · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · War, Ethics, and Justification · 19th century · german · History · immanuel Kant (1724-1804) · Intellect · Mind and body · Philosophy · Philosophy of mind · Psychology

  • Kant's Prolegomena

    Peter Thielke•Kant's Prolegomena•2021

  • Conclusion

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Religiousness B and Agency

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Excursus

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Idealism and Autonomy in Schelling's Early Systems

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • ‘Despair’ in the Pseudonymous Works, and Kierkegaard's Double Incompatibilism

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Kant on Autonomy and Moral Evil

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Freedom against Reason

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Kant's Account of Freedom

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Sovereign Reason

    Adam Cureton•Sovereign Reason•2025

  • Humor, Common Sense and the Future of Metaphysics in the Prolegomena

    Open Access•Michele Merritt, Melissa M Merritt•Kant's Prolegomena•2021

  • Kant’in Dördüncü Mantiksal Yanliş Çikarimi Eleşti̇ri̇si̇

    Open Access•Fatih ÖZGÖKMAN•Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel…•2023

  • Kant’ta Ruhun Basitliği Safsatası

    Open Access•Fatih ÖZGÖKMAN•Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat…•2023

  • Sartre, Kant, and the spontaneity of mind

    Open Access•Dimitris Apostolopoulos•European Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • A priori intuition and transcendental necessity in Kant's idealism

    Open Access•Markus Kohl•European Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • How metaphysics feigns what isn’t there

    Joe Stratmann•British Journal for the History…•2026

  • Kant on the Theoretical Use of the Ideas of Reason

    Open Access•Pirachula Chulanon•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • Kant's “Absurdity Claim”

    Open Access•Rodrigo Zanette de Araujo•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • Kant's mature account of monads as objects in the idea

    Open Access•Pierpaolo Betti•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • An expressivist interpretation of Kant's “I think” 1

    Open Access•Wolfgang Freitag, Karl Kraus•Noûs•2022

  • Some hope for Kant’s Groundwork III

    Open Access•Jessica Saunders•Inquiry•2024

  • Towards fundamental ontology

    Open Access•Camilla Serck-Hanssen, Camilla Serck‐Hanssen•Man and World•2015

  • Kant’s racial mind–body unions

    Open Access•John Nale, John Elias Nale•Man and World•2015

  • Free Will, Foreknowledge, and Creation

    Open Access•Wolfgang Ertl•Kantian Review•2023

  • Kant’s Standpoint Distinction

    Open Access•Markus Kohl•Kantian Review•2018

  • Intellectualism, Relational Properties and the Divine Mind in Kant's Pre-Critical Philosophy

    Open Access•Christopher J Insole, Christopher Insole•Kantian Review•2011

  • Kant’s (Non-Question-Begging) Refutation of Cartesian Scepticism

    Open Access•Colin Marshall•Kantian Review•2019

  • Empirical Cognition in the Transcendental Deduction

    Open Access•Curtis Sommerlatte•Kantian Review•2016

  • Cognitive Spontaneity and the Organisation of the Understanding

    Open Access•Claudi Brink•Kantian Review•2025

  • Kant on Mind-Dependence

    Open Access•Markus Kohl•Kantian Review•2023

  • Kant’s Causal Power Argument Against Empirical Affection

    Open Access•Jonas Jervell Indregard•Kantian Review•2017

  • The Nature of the ‘I Think’

    Open Access•Falk Wunderlich•Kantian Review•2014

  • Modelling Morality

    Open Access•Saikeerthi Rachavelpula•Kantian Review•2026

  • The fate of the immortal soul

    Open Access•Dylan Shaul•British Journal for the History…•2026

  • First Person Illusions

    Open Access•Christopher Peacocke•Philosophical Perspectives•2012

  • Kant and the scientific study of consciousness

    Open Access•Thomas Sturm, Falk Wunderlich•History of the Human Sciences•2010

  • On Strawson On Kantian Apperception

    Dennis Schulting•South African Journal of Philosophy•2008

  • Kant's First Paralogism

    Ian Proops•The Philosophical Review•2010

  • Transcendental idealism and Kant's reconciliation of determinism and libertarianism

    Open Access•Banafsheh Beizaei•The Philosophical Quarterly•2024

  • Précis of Kant's Thinker

    Open Access•Patricia Kitcher•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2013

  • Two Kinds of Self‐Knowledge

    Open Access•Matthew Boyle•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2008

  • Transcendental Philosophy As Capacities‐First Philosophy

    Open Access•Kevin Schäfer, Karl Schafer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2020

  • Kant's Radicalization of Cartesian Foundationalism

    Open Access•Murray Miles•Dialogue•2022

  • The Moral Law as a Fact of Reason and Correctness Conditions for the Moral Law

    Open Access•Byeong D Lee•Dialogue•2018

  • Kant on the Inapplicability of the Categories to Things in Themselves

    Markus Kohl•British Journal for the History…•2014

  • Kant on intuitive understanding and things in themselves

    Open Access•Reed Winegar•European Journal of Philosophy•2017

  • Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard

    Michelle Kosch•FREEDOM AND REASON IN KANT,…•2006

  • Self-Affection and Pure Intuition in Kant

    Jonas Jervell Indregard•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2017

  • Kant and the Problem of Recognition

    Jessica Saunders, Joe Saunders•International Journal of…•2016

  • Kant on Cognizing Oneself as a Spontaneous Cognizer

    Open Access•Markus Kohl•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2019

  • Kant and the Creation of Freedom

    Christopher J Insole•Kant and the creation of freedom•2013

  • Spontaneity and Self-Consciousness in the Groundwork and the B- Critique

    Open Access•Yoon Choi, Yoon Hyung Choi•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2019

  • Kant on Empirical Self-Consciousness

    Janum Sethi•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2021

  • Kant's Conception of the Subject

    Eduardo Molina, Eduardo Molina-Piernas•CR The New Centennial Review•2017

Unique citing works54
Citations per year2,7
Citation span2006 - 2026 (21)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 54

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae